Having high streets which look pleasant rather than grotty should be an aim for local politicians others active in their community. There is the economic reason – businesses tend to do better. There is the safety reason – as the broken windows theory argues and evidence backs up – dealing with grime and grot helps cut crime. There is also a third reason which politicians in particular are often a bit wary of saying, but quite simply having our communities look more pleasant is a desirable end in itself. You do not have to immerse yourself in aesthetic theories to appreciate the value of appearance.
In parts of Bristol there has been some particularly good work at getting street art painted on the shutters of local shops and otherwise bare, ugly walls. This not only brightens up the area, it provides a showcase for artistic talents – and also is an effective tool against graffiti, for once shutters or a wall bear artwork produced by someone in the community, the likelihood of it being covered in tags falls sharply.
Many parts of Canada have a strong tradition of taking this further, with large murals (such as this one featuring Charlie Chaplin illustrates) and decorations to liven up the utility boxes which feature on so many pavements (such as this one from Winnipeg).
Examples of painted utility boxes in the UK are far rarer, though clever pieces of artwork are present on some such as this example in Brixton.
So it was great to see these two examples in Southwark recently, along Borough High Street:
And here also from Borough High Street is what happens when you leave a utility cabinet unadorned:
If you are a councillor, why not try to do something similar in your own patch?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The Joy of Six 1528
Endometriosis and acetylation
Reform makes first gain from Conservatives in this by-election cycle
How Chancellor Reeves torpedoed the economy
Michael Meadowcroft: A Liberal of Intellectual Rigour and Uncommon Integrity
Geoff Reid
Tom Bailey
Leonora Scipio
Kira Collins
Daniel Walker
5 Comments
Final proof of my insanity is that I actually prefer the unadorned one! Taste in art is a very personal thing, and, in the public square, I’d sometimes rather see ‘no art’ to ‘art I don’t like’. Things like red telephone boxes didn’t need art drawn on them for them to look nice. Utility companies should maintain utility boxes so that they never become grotty and rusty.
See also: http://www.brc.org.uk/brc_m_policy_master.asp?id=611&spolicy=21st+century+high+streets
Good post Mark. I’ve been thinking the same thing while walking home from Stratford station. Litter everywhere creates a new normative behaviour of littering. It looks disgusting.
I liked (1) but not (2). (3) is of great artistic merit, but perhaps caviar to the general.
Of course, brightening up the high streets is also a matter of economic and planning policy!
Does anyone paint dog-shit? I am not being abusive, but just asking, as that’s problem number one around my local high street.
Isn’t there a risk that such painting will harm local wildlife, such as roadrunner hunting coyotes? I’ve seen it happen.
Simon – there was a council that spray painted all dog poo fluorescent orange to highlight the problem!