Campaigning you can do in the warm

And, fashionably, it involves a bus. Although it’s not so much campaigning for the Liberal Democrats as for sanity in general and the right of the taxpayer to not have their money used as kindling.

Here’s what gives:

Every Tuesday, at 9.45am precisely, a 50-seat executive coach draws up at a bus stop outside Ealing Broadway station in West London. No one ever gets on and, a moment later, it departs – empty – on a 70-minute trip to Wandsworth Road in South London.

Once there, it waits for two hours and 15 minutes before returning, again carrying no passengers. Welcome to Britain’s most luxurious bus service, paid for by the taxpayer, immaculately clean, punctual to the second and which the Government is trying desperately to keep secret.

This service, funded by the Department for Transport, is not advertised on any timetables or departures screens, and staff at the stations it serves are not even aware it exists.

And for why?

By running a weekly bus, ministers can claim that a service still operates and avoid the legal requirement to hold a public consultation…

The Department for Transport is using a loophole in the law governing rail closures that allows ministers “to secure the provision of substitute bus services if a passenger rail service is temporarily interrupted or has been discontinued”.

The article does not explain fully why the service goes unadvertised, but I imagine the reasoning is that it would quickly become overcrowded and be instantly exposed as an inadequate substitute for the rail service (I can’t imagine it’s quicker, either). In which case, surely, part of the solution is just to run more buses. Or would that be too expensive? But then one bus isn’t expensive?

I am confused. Your mission, London Lib Dems, should you choose to accept it, is to find this bus and ride it, then report back to your handlers at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Ooh! This is right near my work. Going to have to try and get on it…

  • How about:-
    “The bus, the bus, ’twas Gord gave us the bus,
    The bus, the bus, so we won’t make a fuss,
    Why should they be wastrels just so they can lie to us,
    Gord pays for the bus with our money.”

  • David Evans 8th Jan '09 - 11:11am

    Sorry, Anonymous was me.

  • There’s a serious point here – this is not an isolated case.

    There is one train a week between:

    Stockport & Stalybridge (which should simply be scrapped)

    and Wolverhampton & Walsall (which should be restored to a proper service)

    In both cases proper procedures are being bypassed.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chris Cory
    @Richard Whelan. You speak the truth. There is no compelling narrative. People feel that we represent a sort of middle of the road, a tweak here and a tweak ...
  • Chris Cory
    Clearly NS is a complex character and as such is capable of great kindness. I remember reading that when David Cameron’s father was taken ill in the South ...
  • Peter Davies
    @Peter water companies are generally geographically split according to the centres of population supplied not the areas from which it is extracted. They dispose...
  • Barry Rhodes
    Caron this is such an accurate account of the all talk show. Iain Dale is such a great interviewer bringing out the best in anyone he interviews. I agree...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Peter, " If you treat (supply of water and sewage disposal) as one industry and structure it to provide the commodity, the real problem will not get f...