Campaigning you can do in the warm

And, fashionably, it involves a bus. Although it’s not so much campaigning for the Liberal Democrats as for sanity in general and the right of the taxpayer to not have their money used as kindling.

Here’s what gives:

Every Tuesday, at 9.45am precisely, a 50-seat executive coach draws up at a bus stop outside Ealing Broadway station in West London. No one ever gets on and, a moment later, it departs – empty – on a 70-minute trip to Wandsworth Road in South London.

Once there, it waits for two hours and 15 minutes before returning, again carrying no passengers. Welcome to Britain’s most luxurious bus service, paid for by the taxpayer, immaculately clean, punctual to the second and which the Government is trying desperately to keep secret.

This service, funded by the Department for Transport, is not advertised on any timetables or departures screens, and staff at the stations it serves are not even aware it exists.

And for why?

By running a weekly bus, ministers can claim that a service still operates and avoid the legal requirement to hold a public consultation…

The Department for Transport is using a loophole in the law governing rail closures that allows ministers “to secure the provision of substitute bus services if a passenger rail service is temporarily interrupted or has been discontinued”.

The article does not explain fully why the service goes unadvertised, but I imagine the reasoning is that it would quickly become overcrowded and be instantly exposed as an inadequate substitute for the rail service (I can’t imagine it’s quicker, either). In which case, surely, part of the solution is just to run more buses. Or would that be too expensive? But then one bus isn’t expensive?

I am confused. Your mission, London Lib Dems, should you choose to accept it, is to find this bus and ride it, then report back to your handlers at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Ooh! This is right near my work. Going to have to try and get on it…

  • How about:-
    “The bus, the bus, ’twas Gord gave us the bus,
    The bus, the bus, so we won’t make a fuss,
    Why should they be wastrels just so they can lie to us,
    Gord pays for the bus with our money.”

  • David Evans 8th Jan '09 - 11:11am

    Sorry, Anonymous was me.

  • There’s a serious point here – this is not an isolated case.

    There is one train a week between:

    Stockport & Stalybridge (which should simply be scrapped)

    and Wolverhampton & Walsall (which should be restored to a proper service)

    In both cases proper procedures are being bypassed.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Ian Sanderson (RM3)
    Hire car companies do have some bizarre restrictions, often related to individual companies and airports. Among them is various age restrictions for seniors. I ...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Excellent to read this from Southwark Liberal Democrats. I am proposing a motion for September Conference calling for Emergency action to be taken for sufficien...
  • John Armah
    Victor, it is great to hear of Liberal Democrats ambitious for a diverse, resilient, house building sector.With Andy Burnham a keen proponent of devolution isn'...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Wise words from Paul Holmes, who has the experience to back his case. One tiny addition to the continuing debate on what the Liberal Democrats are for from a fr...
  • Simon McGrath
    This seems a surprising decsion. The problem in the London housing markets is not ' deevlopers arent building affordable homes' is that noone is building homes ...