Canonical URLs: improving your website’s performance in search engines

A rather more technical post than usual, but if you are used to playing around with HTML tags or fiddling with the innards of systems such as WordPress, this post has some good news that could make your website perform better in search engines…

The multiple URLs problem

It is quite common for a page on a website to be accessible via more than one web address. For example:;show

and (i.e. without ;show at the end)

both link to the same page.

There are two reasons this might be a problem. First, a search engine may fail to realise that these are the same page and so search results get clogged up with duplicates. Second, some people may link to one version of the URL and other people to the other. Splitting links between these two versions can mean the page performs less well in search engines than if all the links were to just the one.

Search engines are pretty good at trying to deal with this sort of problem, but they aren’t perfect.

The new canonical command

Google, Microsoft and Yahoo have however just teamed up to agree a way of making it easy for people running websites to let search engines know which is the preferred URL for a page so that, even if the search engine follows an alternative version, when it gets to the page it realises what it should be called.

You do this by putting a <link> tag in the <head> section of each page, e.g.

<link rel=”canonical” href=”” />

This tells search engines that even if they access the page via and;show

that all three are the same page and the first URL is the one to be used.

For more information, see Microsoft’s page about the canonical link tag. (Google and Yahoo have pages too, but I think Microsoft’s is better at describing the issue for a relatively non-technical reader and does this without sacrificing necessary technical detail.)

For WordPress users, there is at least one plugin already which helps you make these settings: (Health warning: it’s from a well-regarded source, but I’ve not used it myself yet.)

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.


  • On the subject of improving websites, is there any way of solving the problem of getting out-of-date versions of pages on I have seen other people mention it, so it’s not just me. Clicking “Refresh” doesn’t seem to cure it, though adding a random query string to the URL does.

  • “If you are seeing an old page, try doing a forced refresh (Ctrl+F5) which should request to all three that you want the latest version of a page.”

    Thanks – I’ll try that.

  • Ryan

    I’m afraid Ctrl/F5 doesn’t solve the problem.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    The British government have indicated a possible workaround if Erdogan refuses to change his mind. It has signed a separate “mutual assistance” treaty wi...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    David I think I gave it more as an example of where it happens, to relate it to the question Martin put. I am not saying the woman ought to be prosecuted or ...
  • Charley HastedCharley Hasted
    The line here is 'does this disability hurt the disabled person or the people around them more' imo. Haemophilia, Huntington's, etc unarguably cause more pai...
  • Brad Barrows
    @Martin I claim no great theological knowledge but I always thought the Roman Catholic Church believed that sexual intercourse was sinful unless it was to enab...
  • Tony Vickers
    Setting aside the eugenics argument, the bit I found shocking in Laurence’s piece is this: “ This should be a warning about letting those with money fund re...