Charles Kennedy’s belief in people can save liberal democracy

At this critical juncture, liberal democracy is facing a profound global crisis. Populists, masquerading as the voice of ‘the people’, are gaining traction, while liberals are often perceived as mere mouthpieces for institutions. However, as Charles Kennedy eloquently articulated two decades ago, liberalism is not elitist; it is the most valid form of democracy, deeply rooted in compassion, honesty, and trust in ordinary people.

It’s time to reclaim populism for liberal democracy, wresting it from the grip of extreme factions. This could be a pivotal strategy in our efforts to revitalise liberal democracy, and it’s a task that cannot be delayed.

Charles Kennedy’s political rhetoric points us in the right direction. It was accessible, human, and moral rather than managerial. His opposition to the Iraq War wasn’t just a matter of policy, but also a display of courage against the establishment consensus. He believed that politics should speak to ordinary people first, and then to Westminster. Kennedy knew that the people are always wiser than the government thinks, and wanted the Liberal Democrats to acknowledge that. He argued that our party should offer democratic empowerment without resorting to demagoguery, reducing the role of central government control over public services and handing it to the people who understand the needs of their communities much better than Whitehall.

We can, and must, build upon the foundation Charles Kennedy laid for us. We must pursue a politics that puts power, dignity, and voice back in the hands of citizens, while protecting every individual’s freedom under the law. This includes instituting citizens’ assemblies to run alongside devolved governments, introducing participatory budgeting for local communities, which empowers local people to have a say in how their money is spent, and implementing anti-corruption laws, closing tax loopholes, and championing transparent governance in both public and private bodies.

As Labour adopts a more managerial approach and the populist right hijacks the language of ‘the people’, we must position ourselves as the party that listens first and governs with compassion. Our tradition equips us with the necessary tools: community politics, local campaigning, and grassroots democracy. However, these tools must be updated and modernised for the digital age, to keep pace with the changing political landscape. By embracing egalitarian populism, we can redefine our party’s identity in contrast to both technocrats and demagogues.

Charles Kennedy reminded us that politics must be rooted in people’s real lives. To rebuild trust in democracy, liberals must speak with the same moral clarity he did; not just against injustice, but for belonging, fairness, and freedom.

If populism is truly about “giving people back a voice”, then a truly liberal populism must ensure every voice is heard and every right is protected. That is what Kennedyism is, and that is the way forward for liberal democracy.

* Jack Meredith is a member of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and an active campaigner and canvasser with Swansea and Gower Liberal Democrats. His writing focuses on democratic reform, social justice, trade unionism, economic democracy, and the institutional foundations of effective government. He has written for the Fabians, Lib Dem Voice, Liberator, Nation Cymru, Bylines Cymru, and Centre Think Tank.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • Tristan Ward 11th Nov '25 - 9:11am

    “Kennedy knew that the people are always wiser than the government thinks, and wanted the Liberal Democrats to acknowledge that”

    These are old liberal instincts: Gladstone put it this way:

    “Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence; conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear”.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tony Vickers
    @Tom Reeve you sort of get it but lets be specific how we'd pay for raising the income tax threshold. We would tax the annual rental value of land. Its been our...
  • cim
    Matt (Bristol): for single-member AV it's not terrible, but most ways of including it in multi-member STV break the proportional representation aspect very badl...
  • Rif Winfield
    Jack, you are absolutely right, as were Tom Ellis and the young David Lloyd George. The tragedy of the Newport meeting in January 1896 was that it set back the ...
  • Diana Simpson
    You would have a problem of public transport capacity to cope with kids going home in the rush hour(s) rather than before it. Our local buses are missed out whi...
  • Chloe
    "We did use RON in single-winner STV / AV elections at my Students Union. But I’m not sure I see it as constructive practical politics" That's where it sho...