Checking my underwear

Dateline: Brighton, September 2018

Wandering into Conference a leaflet is thrust into my hands. It touches on current Government consultation on the Gender Recognition Act.

One paragraph of the leaflet sets the tone “sex self-ID that would allow any man to get his birth certificate reissues in the opposite sex. Just like that. On demand. With no change to his body and no medical supervision.”

The rest of the leaflet is a list of scenarios each more prurient than the last. None of these scenarios are evidenced as ever having happened, no evidence that a trans woman has ever abused the trust of other women in these sensationalist and inflammatory ways. Just a list of “what if”.

Leaving aside the paucity of the author’s hypothesis there is another consideration, if not sex self-ID then what?

The author suggests “changes to his body” and “medical supervision”.

While this article is not a treatise on the NHS most people recognise that for anything beyond measles that means triage, waiting times, a postcode lottery, financial limits and gatekeepers.

In the context of the current gender recognition process (leading to a Gender Recognition Certificate and a new Birth Certificate) that means two medical practitioners from suitable disciplines with experience in treating gender dysphoria.

Let me tell you about my gatekeepers.

My third psychiatrist was a sincere doctor from Iran. They cared about their patients, understood the genuine and immediate health care implications of gender dysphoria – depression, stress, frustration, anger, self-harm, self-loathing and suicide. They wanted to help not just by treating the symptoms, but the root cause as well. Everything a good doctor should be.

My second psychiatrist (and gatekeeper) was more concerned with gathering data for a doctoral thesis than treating their patients. Non-compliance was never an option, especially when their supervising professor was also my first psychiatrist.

The professor was a truly old-fashioned gatekeeper. Without his agreement there could be no access to hormone treatment, no access to speech therapy, no surgery and no paperwork.

Definitely old school. For him, being a woman meant wearing a skirt or dress – turning up in trousers always a black mark. His concession to modernity was tights, even if he still preferred stockings and suspenders. How could he tell? Well he was not averse to checking the underwear of his patients. And I don’t mean with a multiple-choice question – physical inspection in the privacy of his own office. 

Rumours persisted that inspection was a prelude to worse for patients easily cowed and already desperate for treatment.

Gender identity should not be determined by financial or misogynist gatekeepers anymore than public toilets need staff to check the contents of my underwear.

* Jean Johnson is a pseudonym. The author is known to the Lib Dem Voice team.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Mick Taylor 23rd Sep '18 - 5:27pm

    I also had this leaflet thrust into my hand. Does anyone seriously believe that transgender people would pretend?! As I understand it there is zero evidence. Changing one’s gender is a really serious business only undertaken by people who really believe they’re the wrong gender and want to change it.
    The leaflet also assumed that gender change is one way only male to female. It also made the absurd suggestion that men would pretend they had changed their gender just to get into women’s spaces.
    I really am almost speechless. There are few things this dreadful government do that are right but changing the rules on birth certificates when someone changes their gender is one of them.
    The trans people that I know have changed their gender and gone through a lot to do it. Why a few militant feminists need to attack people who have changed their gender and become women is totally beyond me.
    Had I realised what I was being given I would have refused it and told the giver why.
    As Liberals we must support trans people and speak out against this small number of bigots.

  • OnceALibDem 23rd Sep '18 - 6:09pm

    You can respond to the consultation here:
    https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reform-of-the-gender-recognition-act-2004

    Consultation closes 11pm Oct 19th

  • Sue Sutherland 24th Sep '18 - 12:07pm

    Thank you Jean for your moving post. I find it upsetting that it’s my generation of feminists that are making life even more difficult for you.

  • Mick Taylor 24th Sep '18 - 3:32pm

    I have just completed the government questionnaire on changes to the GRA.
    I was amazed at the level of my ignorance about the restrictions that are placed on trans people. I had no idea of how many times the law allows them to be treated as pariahs – at work, in hostels, in sport, in health services on pensions – puts major obstacles in the way of trans people and non-binary people and gives access to GRCs to a whole range of inappropriate people..
    I urge every Liberal Democrat to complete the survey and find out just how bad things are for trans people.
    I have always supported trans people but will now be even more militant on their behalf.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTom Harney 5th Jul - 4:04am
    The objectives discussed are not objectives for the party. They might be objectives for the country. We urgently need objectives for the party. What format...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 5th Jul - 2:06am
    Tony Blair has recently offered his thoughts on the future of progressive politics in the UK https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/12/tony-blair-s-speech-future-labour-and-progressive-politics-full-text “To win power, we need self-discipline not self-indulgence;...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 12:07am
    @ George, ".....you don’t remember any of my counter-arguments." You could be right. At least I thought so because I genuinely can't! But, you've written...
  • User AvatarPeter Kenny 4th Jul - 11:39pm
    The Windrush scandal followed directly from the 2014 Immigration Act, supported by almost all MPs - only 7 voted against, none of them Lib Dem’s....
  • User AvatarPeter Kenny 4th Jul - 11:33pm
    The current benefit sanctions regime was introduced in 2012. You were in power as part of the coalition at the time. Callous, terrible heartless Tories?...
  • User AvatarJohn O 4th Jul - 11:24pm
    'John O: What student politics?' 'Commandeering the UK private health sector' That's apart from all the baggage