More material for Libdemologists, from the Telegraph:
The Lib Dem leader said that members of the Labour Party had approached his party looking for help in preventing the Tories taking power after the next election…
Mr Clegg, whose party begins its annual conference on Saturday in Bournemouth, said he will not take part in any alliance with Labour.
Read the full story here
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Andy Burnham has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to renew British democracy. He should take it. (Roz Savage MP)
Why the Lib Dem Defence Bonds plan is a bad idea (Nick Baird)
Vince Cable writes: Manchesterism and Localism (Vince Cable)
William Wallace writes: What do Liberal Democrats have to offer the “left behind”? (Lord William Wallace)
Battling Burnham: a Liberal Democrat response (John Armah)
The making of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)
Taking the goats to Lobley Hill.
Trip to the Hoppings
Jonathan Liew tots up the price English cricket has paid for Bazball
Centenary of Emily Hobhouse's death marked in Cornwall
Reg Calvert, Oliver Smedley, Hayek and the nature of liberty
What would it take for Capita to be banned from government contracts?
Calling out the anti-asylum seeker nonsense
Jason Connor 
Jana 
paul barker 
Mick Taylor 
Nonconformistradical 
One Comment
Surely it’s not a surprise that Labour would want to prevent the Tories from taking power in a hung parliament!
But if accurate the following sounds like a bit of cock-up, and illustrates the shortcomings of the “let’s-get-Vince-Cable-to-write-a-pamphlet-and-if-any-bits-don’t-go-down-too-well-we-can-always-say-it’s-only-his-personal-opinion-and-not-party-policy” strategy:
“The Tories also highlighted differences between Mr Clegg and his Treasury spokesman, Vince Cable.
Dr Cable, who has called for a wide-ranging programme of public sector cuts, said in a BBC Radio Four interview that no area of spending should be protected.
But in a Times Educational Supplement, Mr Clegg suggested that school spending should be ring-fenced and spared any cuts.”