Clegg on expenses – but what should he do if Lib Dems are named and shamed?

Well, it’s Tuesday evening, five days after the Telegraph first started ‘naming and shaming’ Labour and Tory MPs who have deliberately taken advantage of their own system of MPs’ expenses to make frequently indefensible claims ranging from the petty to the extravagant… And all Lib Dems are currently holding our breaths to see if tomorrow or Thursday will bring revelations of what our own MPs have been up to, if anything.

Nick Clegg was on the BBC today making a staunch defence of the party’s previous efforts to reform the system, blocked by Labour and the Tories:

But his efforts will count for little if the Telegraph is able to identify ‘within the rules’ expenses claims from Lib Dem MPs which breach the spirit of those rules, and which will appear grubby to the public. Yesterday I suggested that amidst the rubble of this situation, there was little Nick could do while also observing due process and natural justice.

A number of you took me to task in the comments thread, and made good, robust, fair suggestions for what Nick should be prepared to do, beyond simply apologising and continuing to campaign for reform. (Indeed, a number were put forward today by David Cameron in the wake of his party’s shaming.) Proposals included the establishment of a review panel to consider abuses alleged by the Telegraph, with:

  • minor errors to result in a formal warning from the party leader;
  • significant claims contrary to the spirit of the rules – including any capital gains – to be fully repaid, with a further 10% to charity, and dismisal from the front-bench;
  • ‘major scams’ – including the ‘flipping’ of second homes – to result in the withdrawal of the whip.

    Now let’s see what the next 24 hours brings to see if these proposals can remain purely hyporthetical…

  • Read more by or more about or .
    This entry was posted in Op-eds and Parliament.
    Advert

    4 Comments

    • Andrew Duffield 12th May '09 - 9:48pm

      He MUST insist that 100% of second home capital gains are repaid – not just the 18% that HMRC requires. There can be NO Lib Dem profiteering from taxpayer cash.

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • Peter Martin
      @ David Raw, On a point of information: The word "you" in the English language isn't necessarily singular. It can be plural. It would possibly be better,...
    • Little Jackie Paper
      Peter Martin - 'It’s a great pity that the Euroscepticism of the Labour Party largely passed away with Tony Benn.' Well...it's not been remarked on much bu...
    • David Raw
      @ Peter Martin The Greens are no threat to me, Peter. You assume too much. I appreciate their contribution at Holyrood which is not insignificant....
    • Peter Martin
      @ David Raw, I don't have a problem with environmental radicalism but I do trying to understand why anyone on the left thinks it's radical to support a euro-...
    • suzanne fletcher
      in interval for next phone bank to be ready - how true. My friend and colleague Julia Cherrett who was a serving cllr died last year, and it is the by election...