Clegg tackles immigrant amnesty critics

As I type, Nick Clegg has just finished an introduction to the party conference motion on immigration. He’s billing it as a departure from a government approach that has mixed “tub-thumping populism” with incompetence and promises “a much more rational, competent and fair response to this vexed issue”. But there are some seperate votes coming up from delegates who challenge a few of the policy motion’s points.

The headline measure is an amnesty for the estimated 600,000 individuals who exist outside any regular residence arrangements – people the government doesn’t know are here. The idea is to give those who’d been in Britain at least 10 years a chance to get a two-year work permit and then full citizenship.

To do this they’d need to pass an improved citizenship (less learning-by-rote stuff than at present) and pay a fee (“low thousands”, Nick guessed, when reporters pressed him at this morning’s press conference). There would also be a language test. The motion originally specified English, but I’m delighted to report a friendly amendment has been accepted to include the Welsh-fluent irregular immigrant in the amnesty too.

There’s no telling – Nick has emphasised – how many of these estimated 600,000 would come forward and how many have been here for the necessary 10 years. He says that it’s an experimental policy, and the 10-year probation could be shorter if that proves necessary. But at least some delegates here in Brighton are worried that the 10 years is too long and have won a seperate vote on that part of the motion. Nick has already been at pains to rebut The Independent’s categorisation of his motion as ‘get tough’ measures.

In addition, Nick has argues that the level of immigration to Britain is not too high and that there is no ideal number. He says the Tories have been “at their worst swivel-eyed… at their best they are silent” on immigration and the government have proved so incompetent “they couldn’t run the turnstile on a public loo”.

Co-author Simon Hughes is summing up and will be hoping that delegates are convinced the plans “make immigration work for Britain”, with a “liberal, enlightened, progressive, pragmatic policy”. We’ll let you know how the vote goes as it happens.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    I see that the Western liberal democracies are gearing up for some more sanctions to be imposed on Iran for firing those obsolete missile and drones in retaliat...
  • Tim Leunig
    There are two classes of children at the moment - those whose parents smoke - often in doors, at home, and those whose parents do not. Why would we want to allo...
  • Geoff Reid
    Charles is quite right. With all due respect to East Cambridgeshire doing what we might hope they would do, the Farnham result is very, very encouraging. Comin...
  • Katharine Pindar
    @ David Raw. Hi, David, you are quite right to draw attention again to the two -child limitation and the benefit cap, which are helping to keep many families in...
  • David Blake
    @Duncan Greenland. It would be better if it was just one sequence by candidate name, with an index by constituency. As it is there is duplication and a degree...