CommentIsLinked@LDV… Vince Cable: Banks pay up for their ‘crimes’, so why not rapists?

Over at the Daily Mail, Lib Dem deputy leader Vince Cable argues that Britain’s system of compensation awards is “mad”. Here’s an excerpt:

… The real scandal, however, is the meanness of the criminal injuries and military compensation system. The Armed Forces scheme is now being, belatedly, reviewed. But criminal injury awards seem likely to remain not only pitifully small but severely restricted and tardy. I had to write angry letters to the Government agency dealing with criminal injuries when a constituent – an innocent bystander who had been attacked by gangsters throwing acid in a pub – had been waiting for more than four years for a payout.

Compensation is withheld if the victim of crime is held to have provoked the injury by self-defence. There is now the outrageous suggestion that a victim’s previous motoring offences be considered in making awards to victims of violent crimes. Several years ago, I set up a parliamentary all-party group for victims of crime and sought to remedy these injustices. For many victims, especially of violent crime, the compensation issue is a secondary one.

Their primary concern is that criminals should be caught and properly punished. My constituent who was raped has the satisfaction of knowing that her assailant was caught and is now enjoying a long prison sentence. But then to offer her just £3,300 compensation borders on insult.

Lurking behind the meanness of criminal injuries compensation are Government budget worries. Surely the fair and sensible way to deal with the problem is not to punish the victim of crime but the criminal. Criminal injuries compensation should be made more generous but with the cost being claimed back from prisoners’ earnings while in prison or on release.A lot of prisoners are released early while their victims’ injuries may be permanent.

If City banks can be made to pay up for harassment of employees and a council made to pay up for negligent site works 20 years ago, surely criminals can be made to pay for their violent crimes.

You can read the article in full HERE.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Wrigley
    @Jana: I regrade myself as an extremest for liberalism: the maximum amount of individual freedom that doesn't infringe the freedom others. I’m also pretty ke...
  • Roland
    >”He’d voted in every general election since 1974, he said, and this was the first time he had ever voted for a winning candidate.” Well I could say t...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Jack, Starmer knew how to have good relations with the Trades Unions. Pity it didn't last. As soon as he was PM he was suspending his own MPs for doing wha...
  • Richard Dickson
    Building a brand does indeed involve consideration of WHAT (issues and policies). But more important for creating lasting memories and trust, and winning heads,...
  • Paul Reynolds
    Thanks very much Rob for setting out the issue of LD strategy, and the essential framework for the Strategy Review. Best wishes to the review team with a diffic...