CommentIsLinked@LDV: Vince Cable – We’re the masters of the banking universe

Over at The Times, Lib Dem deputy leader Vince Cable argues that government should stop being so polite and lay down the law: free up lending, regulate risk and don’t sell the taxpayer short. Here’s an excerpt:

There is a battle royal being fought out over the scale and scope of regulation. There is some common ground: mindless, bureaucratic box-ticking has to give way to a form of supervision that identifies systemic risk; there is also agreement around the concept of “macro-prudential” regulation, with the Bank of England in the lead.

There are powerful forces arguing for the return to the status quo ante. We are being told nothing should be done to inhibit “innovation” or the “competitiveness” of our financial institutions. If the Chancellor has any bottle, he will say we have had too much financial innovation. And industries that fail or put too much risk on the rest of the economy are not in our national interest. Ask the millions who will lose their jobs and the thousands who will lose their homes because City gambling was allowed to get out of control.

You can read the article in full HERE.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • Terry Gilbert 8th Jul '09 - 3:10pm

    Absolutely. We should be reminding everybody that it was the Tories who deregulated the banks. Gordon merely feared them branding him a socialist.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • PM
    "the general public perception that somehow the BoE Base Rate is linked to the cost of borrowing" This is because it is. The banks can always ...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    Jana - I like it. It is addressing the issue practically. The pitch is never empty and the operator loses nothing. The harder part comes later. Rules, even cont...
  • cim
    The constitutional preamble has two big problems with it as a statement of "what the Lib Dems are for" 1) As a statement of principle it doesn't distinguish ...
  • Jason Connor
    I think it's really disappointing to see another poster call those who disagree with them a numpty. That kind of patronising insult devalues their argument. The...
  • David Evans
    No! What are you thinking about?...