Daily View 2×2: 5 June 2020

2 big stories

Yesterday, the New York Times published an opinion piece by the junior US Senator for Arkansas, Tom Cotton, which called upon President Trump to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act to

employ the military “or any other means” in “cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws”

by way of an overwhelming show of force against protestors. Why is this important? Because Tom Cotton is a potential Republican nominee for the Presidency in the not that distant future.

It would be fair to say that there was a backlash, as the editorial page editor himself admitted.

There is a valid question to be asked about how communities are policed. Bringing in the armed forces really isn’t on the list of sane answers though.

Getting on a train, or a bus, or (less likely) an aeroplane in England? Don’t forget your face mask from Monday week. Perhaps lessons in how to wear one would be good too, although most of the public think that they’ll look silly wearing a mask. Personally, I’ll be wearing one if I have to leave mid-Suffolk by public transport…

2 3 social media posts

We have a leadership contest and, whilst Liberal Democrat Voice are committed to neutrality in terms of the various contenders, I thought that it might be nice to see their Twitter offerings yesterday and so, in the order that they appeared on my Local Party’s Twitter feed…

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Advert

One Comment

  • Clive Peaple 6th Jun '20 - 10:06am

    2 big stories? Should be government ‘cave in’ to US over food standards and the fact that Suella Braverman (ex Fernandes) is Attorney General and therefore in a position to rule whether or not Cummings was a law/advice breaker. Separation of powers easily circumvented. Very British. Remember her Brexity rejection of Euratom? Faced with overwhelming scientific argument she just ignored all argument. While Trump uspses the bible imagery like Hitler and the nazi State Church, we desperately lack a Mattis and therefore have to suffer the far right direction of a Rees Mogg. Meanwhile Matthew Elliott and wife happily cement the US – UK far right link.
    Perhaps LDs might consider the Covid wracked UK (North West R = > 1) rather than the enjoyable but possibly dilettante distance consideration of Trump (who will, simply, win or lose on the economy).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    The 2 big parties - Labour and Conservative - spent almost £55 Million between them during the 2024 General election while ReformUK could only afford to spend ...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Thanks for a most relevant and interesting article! Might the following policies be liberal in their content and democratic in their practices? 1) Univers...
  • Owen Driscoll
    The party needs to ditch fairness and the veil of ignorance. And focus more on Mills harm principles instead of Rawls. Rawls is deontological, Mill is consequen...
  • Adam
    "Labour and the Greens want to do things for you, the Conservatives and Reform want to do things to you, but the Liberal Democrats want to do things along with ...
  • John Payne
    Thanks to Tom for a broad brush summary of how attitudes to what has happened in Palestine have changed since the formation of the state of Israel. However, I ...