David Davis: a bounder and a braggart

UPDATE: There is an update to this story, published the following day on Lib Dem Voice, in which The Guardian makes clear that the quote on which this posting was based was not uttered by David Davis.

David Davis has had many warm words written about him by Lib Dems – myself included – since he took his decision to quit Parliament to fight for his beliefs in civil liberties, and most notably Labour’s obscene push to detain without charge for up to 42 days.

True, there have also been some harsh words written about him – but the majority view has been that his decision to trigger a by-election was borne primarily of principle, and that the Lib Dems were right therefore not to put up a candidate and risk splitting the votes of those who are in agreement on 42 days. That, after all, is why David Davis (understandably) spoke with Nick Clegg before deciding to put his head above the parapet.

Which makes it all the more disappointing to see him stooping to indulge in petty partisan politics, at least according to this quote in today’s Guardian attributed to Mr Davis:

I’m sorry that Labour and the Liberal Democrats funked it, but we’re still having a good argument and getting the issue raised.” (Hat-tip Tony Greaves).

One can perhaps admire the effrontery of Mr Davis for seeking a behind-doors deal with the Lib Dems before calling a by-election, and then condemning the Lib Dems during the by-election for agreeing to that behind-doors deal. But, actually, it’s just a damned cheek.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.
Advert

16 Comments

  • Can we ask his campaign press office if he said it and if so, Clegg should demand an apology

  • And if Davis didn’t say that, maybe he should ask an apology from the Guardian?

  • I DEFINITELY think an apology is needed. That is completely out of order.

  • Martin Land 9th Jul '08 - 7:11pm

    Thanks to a series of clearly thought out strategic decisions, we are fighting to win in Glasgow East, but not Haltemprice and Howden.

    Right.

  • I am still an admirer & supporter of Davis, & it will take more than this to make me waver.

    My views are straightforward. It is about time someone stood up to the relentless erosion of our liberties, on totally fatuopus grounds, by Labour.

    It is, in fact, better for such an assault to come from the right. It is known that we support civil liberties, now Joe Average is aware that there is a coalition for freedom. He has partially undermined his own cause in such a way, but he should, & probably will, gather together liberal & left-wing libertarians. Initiatives such as “Liberal Conspiracy”, & the interface between various pro-freedom blogs, show how this can be done.

    It goes without saying that I oppose Davis’ views on Section 28, the death penalty, & various elements of criminal law. But he is not proposing to bring those in, is he? He is striking a blow for freedom, & the likes of Johann Hari sneering at him is not going to hold back my feelings on the matter.

    Let us all hammer the nails into the coffin of the Murdoch press forever.

  • While Davis bangs on about the threat of 42 days’ executive detention for a handful of terrorist suspects, far more serious assaults on our liberties are perpetrated with barely a murmur of dissent.

    One of our most precious liberties is surely freedom of movement – the right to go where we like when we like. Something we lacked under the feudal system, or in Brezhnev’s Soviet Union, but now taken for granted.

    So why did Liberal Democrats sit back in silence while the state gave the Police the power to impose marshal law on under 16s at will?

    Look at this story in today’s Grauniad and catch a glimpse of things to come:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jul/09/ukcrime.children

    Laurence Boyce may sneer and accuse me of “libertarian paranoia”, but the fact is we already do live in a police state and the situation is getting worse by the day.

    Ah, young people don’t deserve rights, authoritarian conservatives will tell us; and even if they do, they don’t vote, and a lot of people who do vote hate them, so there is nothing to be gained by defending their liberties.

    Well, I have news for those who cling to such complacency. Marshal law for under 16s presages marshal law for adults (or at least adults who don’t belong to the elite). And we have already had it – in the countryside, during the so-called foot and mouth “crisis”; and this was meekly acquiesced in by millions.

    If the Lib Dem leadership was serious about civil liberties, it would be telling the young people of Redruth to get out into the streets and parks after 9.00pm and defy the fascists. It seems to me that mass civil disobedience is the only way to stop this madness.

  • What did we expect? A Tory to give us good press? So much for the wonderfully ‘principled’ and ‘honourable’ stance we agreed to. How stupid we now look.

  • Davis has praised the Lib Dems for standing throughout, and criticised Labour for not standing. It is clear that this quote is inaccurate.

  • Cheltenham Robin 9th Jul '08 - 10:15pm

    I said previously on this forum that Nick Clegg should have wangled a joint press conference out of Davis on the subject of 42 days in return for not standing.

    The bloke’s a Tory, they are still the “nasty” party and will never change.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCassie 18th Jun - 10:32am
    Key point being that even if there is some amazing Brexit benefit for the NHS, it will be for England only. Either they think Welsh...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 18th Jun - 10:20am
    @Cassie "David Raw… And the relevance/usefulness of your remark to 2018, to Brexit, to TM cynically linking extra NHS cash for England (only) with Brexit…...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 18th Jun - 10:13am
    @Peter Martin "Dianne Abbot was widely criticised for attempting a similar back-of-envelope type calculation as yourself when she mentioned recruiting 1000 police officers who were...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 18th Jun - 9:49am
    Thank you David. I wasn't trying to undermine you. I don't treat comments exchanges as a sort of game. I have plenty of other things...
  • User AvatarLyn N 18th Jun - 9:32am
    @Cassie Quite. The Lib Dem’s as a minor partner in a coalition are only ever going to be able to soften the actions of larger...
  • User AvatarGlenn 18th Jun - 9:30am
    Military spending is not just about defence. It's about selling arms and expertise. It can kill people, which I'm pretty certain is not a public...