David Laws on the latest GCSE results

Our place to talk – an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.

The most-read independent website by and for Lib Dem supporters. Not paid for by trade unions or millionaires.

Advert

David Laws on the latest GCSE results

By Mark Pack | Mon 1st December 2008 - 10:30 am

Follow @markpack

From The Guardian:

Fewer than half of teenagers left school with five good GCSEs including English and maths this summer, official figures revealed yesterday.

Some 47% of 16-year-olds across England achieved the basic target grades. The government said it was a 0.9 percentage point improvement on last year – and an 11.6-point increase since 1997 – but opposition MPs criticised the lack of progress in closing the achievement gap between rich and poor…

The GCSE results showed record rises in London, where 49.8% of pupils hit the target, beating the national average. The government claimed it as a success for the London Challenge programme, which offers tailored support to struggling schools, and the academy programme, which is most concentrated in the capital.

Improvement rates in academies continued to outstrip the national average with a rise of 2.9 percentage points in the proportion getting five good GCSEs, including English and maths, to 28.1%. This still leaves the average of academies below the government target of 30% that marks schools out for possible closure.

David Laws, the Liberal Democrat education spokesman, said: “It’s completely unacceptable that so many children are still not getting a good basic set of qualifications.

“These figures highlight the appalling fact that half of all children in English schools are still failing to get five good GCSEs including English and maths.”

Read more by Mark Pack or more about david laws or education.
This entry was posted in News.

Advert

One Comment

sanbikinoraion 1st Dec '08 - 2:06pm

So, does this mean that GCSEs are getting harder, then …?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Op-eds

Reflections on the Hungarian Election (Theo Brown)
How to stop Labour stealing our lunch on Europe (Blaise Baquiche)
Mississippi: Historic change has come at last (The Voice)
The only Tory MP to join the SDP (Cody Butler)
A Proposed Alternative to Coalition: The Reserved Time Confidence Agreement (Owen Driscoll)

Advert

Recent Comments

Tristan Ward
If Britain is to join the EU (or even the Single Market/a new Customs Union) there has to be a broad consensus across the political spectrum. That means ther...
Mick Taylor
My recollection is that the constitution gives control over voting to the states, so there would be no federal intervention possible....
Peter Davies
"Please Democrats – where you now control state legislatures – reverse the suppression and the gerrymandering." Of course they should and probably will do t...
Martin Pierce
Not mentioned much is the appalling voter suppression in Mississippi. 230,000 taken off the voter rolls earlier this year, strangely but completely coincidental...
cim
I expect the answer is as simple as the Greens (and to a lesser extent the Lib Dems) were benefiting from the "Starmer is so terrible we can't vote Labour any m...