I think this letter from Brent Labour MP Dawn Butler should be filed in the “Things not to do” category.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Why community politics matters (Mark Corner)
-
A Federal Britain: 1. Renewing democracy through fair representation (Iain Donaldson)
-
A roadmap to Queer Equality (Tara Foster)
-
A strange but welcome feeling (Jennie Rigg)
-
Fifteen years ago today…… (Caron Lindsay)
-
The Disneyfication of Haley Mills
-
Hodge and his Masters and The Choirmaster's Burial
-
Survation now put Andy Burnham 10 points ahead in Makerfield
-
A perpetual pirouette of prevarication?
-
Michael Meadowcroft: A Liberal of Intellectual Rigour and Uncommon Integrity
-
Debt-ridden graduates claim they are seen as cash cows
Recent Comments
Ruth Bright
Such a heartening Question Time from Jake 👏...
BigTallTim
A very good article Mark....
Daniel Walker
@Tom Bailey "How many voters of Holborn and St Pancras, Lisbon, or Seville voted for Ursula von der Leyen? Answer : None, because 250 million Europeans, neve...
Richard Good
I first met Michael in the Ripon By-Election in the mid seventies when Leeds Bookseller David Austwick won the seat . He was a good friend and adviser when I wa...
Matt (Bristol)
Jenny, the whole thread discusses the opinion of LGBT+ Lib Dems that the party should argue for a new piece of legislation redefining and replacing the GRA as i...
4 Comments
Paris Hilton one day. Dawn Butler the next. 😉
“The ignoring and lack of reporting by the W&B”
Was quite prepared to give the letter the once over, but
a)I’ve suddenly realised I haven’t got the time to read the 3000 word essay and
b)This doesn’t register as a grammatically correct sentence…even in my world..
I take it she wants them to publish all her votes that are with the labour govt too?
As a former news editor of the Willesden and Brent Chronicle (as it then was called, more than a decade ago) I’m absolutely delighted to find the paper is still treating jumped-up, self important hacks in exactly the same way we used to in my day.