The most exciting part of the Parliamentary Boundary review proposals

This is, colleagues in Scotland in particular note, an England only policy announcement:

We consider that the use of commas in existing constituency names is currently inconsistent and sometimes does not aid clarity. We have therefore taken a policy decision that commas will no longer be included in the names of constituencies.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

16 Comments

  • Mind = blown.

  • So, let me get this straight: the Scots can still have constituencies with commas while the English can’t? I see a new debate coming on, a debate to make the West Lothian Question pale into insignificance by comparison…

  • Paul Griffiths 13th Sep '11 - 12:42pm

    Has the deadline for Emergency Motions passed?

  • Malcolm Todd 13th Sep '11 - 2:08pm

    thechristophe wins the prize for comment even geekier than the announcement … 😉

  • Malcolm, I think he is not using his apostrophe correctly. My apology for furher pedantry. Are any of these issues only applicable in England also?

  • Sorry. For older readers, “Not also but only”.

  • Richard Hill 13th Sep '11 - 9:28pm

    At last something worth talking about

  • Will the Boundary Commission be consulting widely on their new draft proposals on commas? 🙂

  • Patricia Stokes-Smith 14th Sep '11 - 11:11am

    Is there any chance of a new series of Yes Minister – this is perfect!

  • Kevin Larkin 16th Sep '11 - 1:25pm

    They haven’t been entirely consistent. Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner retains its comma.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    "we know at the Additional Rate the difference between 50% and 45% is sufficient for those earning under £1m pa to invest in active avoidance schemes" If you i...
  • Roland
    I take it that once Covid was "over2 the Libdems simply "returned to the office" (wrt to conference) and discarded all the work on "same time different place" p...
  • roland
    @Tristan Ward “The claims of tax bring a disincentive to work are pure right wing propaganda.” So what exactly is the point of earning a £1 an hour ex...
  • Roland
    @Tim (24th Oct '26 - 4:32pm - "More facts here –" Interesting background read, it probably explains why the IFS and the super-rich would like to go back to a ...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    @Mark I agree conference is too expensive. Also it is very costly in terms of time. For those working to get days off to attend is, in itself, using a precious ...