Does “Assume” Make an Ass out of U and Me?

Once upon a time our assumptions about interest rates were that they were always in plural digits. Now we accept near zero interest rates and some accept negative interest rates as normal as they have been around for about a decade.

What would happen if currently “normal” mortgage rates returned to their higher previous “normal” rates? What would happen to car sales and the like if we returned to the “old normal” interest rates? How can people and institutions save when interest rates are nominal and interest fruitful amounts of money are so vulnerable?

With near zero interest rates, is the stock market the only actual vehicle for investment income? Is it reliable for the many?

Another previous normal assumption was that massive money creation would result in inflation/excessive inflation. It hasn’t. (Assuming relevant data is accurate). Can we now assume that the massive use of money trees does not, in practice, affect inflation significantly?

If this is the case, do our assumptions about state finance come into question? Is the reality that states can create enough money to run a state with good infrastructures, safety nets and the like with little or no taxation?

Does wealth correlate highly with power? Can wealth buy power in a democracy? If so, might this change our assumptions on taxation? Might we then consider that a prime purpose of taxation is to create/maintain real democracy? With increasing differences of income, can we reasonably assume that we are conniving at a reduction of democracy, which needs equitable and sustainable provision for all? Taxation can do this and so strengthen our society now and in the long term. Is there a better way of managing the increasing financial fissures in our society?

When there are moves to protect the poor and to maintain or improve our essential infrastructures, we are warned about the dangers of tax and spend policies. But is this commanding cliché accurate? Is it backwards? If our governments create money, directly and indirectly, it is a form of macro spending. Some of this release of money, aka spending, is then regained via taxation. Might we be more accurate to speak, and so think in terms of spend and tax policies?

Similarly, can we be sure that the sound housekeeping or balance the books models of national finance management is secure? The government creates its money. Our households do not. If the government recoups in taxation and reduction of the services needed to run an efficient nation, where are the monies and infrastructures needed by private enterprise?

Challenge your assumptions. Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while or the light won’t come in.
Alan Alda

 

 

 

* Steve Trevathan is chairperson of Lyme Regis and Marshwood Vale Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 18th Jun - 11:19pm
    How about instead of relying on some nonsense about the EU we have a real argument about health and social care reform? Just a thought....
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 18th Jun - 10:56pm
    Without wanting to sidetrack this to Grenfell, it is also worth reading this - https://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2017/jun/25/grenfell-reflects-the-accountability-vacuum-left-by-crumbling-local-press We - all of us - need to have a...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 18th Jun - 10:50pm
    This is a really interesting point. What we are really, I think, talking about here is the decline of civil society. That might be reflected...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 18th Jun - 10:45pm
    Cassie and Lynn N. Relevance? Just pointing out the obvious truth demonstrated in the ballot box - and the money isn't just for England. May...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 18th Jun - 10:05pm
    Clearly, a Government exclusively dedicated to Brexit must adopt the attitudes of the leave-campaign towards facts, truth, and logic, and its ready acceptance of Russian...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 18th Jun - 9:47pm
    @Teresa Wilson You know, I tend to agree with you. It’s PR or nothing. However, that’s no guarantee that Lib Dem electoral fortunes would change...