Ed and Vince appeal to Sajid Javid to retain people’s rights to access Home Office data about them

Sajid Javid has been urged to dump the controversial Immigration Exemption Clause from the Data Protection Bill when it returns to the Commons next week.

Vince Cable and  Ed Davey have written to the new Home Secretary to urge him to protect people’s fundamental rights when their data is being processed for immigration purposes.

Many immigration decisions are overturned at appeal because the Home Office has made mistakes. But the bill puts at risk the right for individuals to see what information the Home Office holds on them and the Lib Dems are pressuring the government to make a concession on this point.

The letter says:

Congratulations on taking up your new post. As you have acknowledged, the task facing you is immense.

Further to exchanges in the House yesterday, can we urge you to clear the air by publishing any report made by Philip Hammond as Foreign Secretary in 2016 to the Home Office about deportations of the Windrush generation, following his meetings with Caribbean ministers and their representations to him? In the chamber you only said you would ‘consider’ publication in the House of Commons library. We hope you will agree that the House should know whether the Prime Minister knew these deportations were happening and what actions she took as Home Secretary to stop them.

In addition, can we ask you urgently to revisit the Immigration Exemption Clause in the Data Protection Bill? You will soon be briefed by officials on the substantial number of immigration decisions which are overturned at appeal because the Home Office has made mistakes. Key to revealing those mistakes is the right for individuals to see what information the Home Office holds on them – a right at risk in the Bill. Amendment 15 to the Bill, which will be debated next week, would maintain these rights: if you sign it or table a satisfactory alternative government amendment, you will have our strong support.

Drawing on the public goodwill towards those British people who were victims of the Windrush scandal, you enter office with an exceptional opportunity to change the culture and nature of debate about immigration in this country. We hope you will work across party lines to seize it.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Mick Taylor 2nd May '18 - 3:27pm

    Given the nature of modern government, Sajid David will not succeed unless he has the backing of No. 10. (See Yes Minister or Crossman’s Diaries of a Cabinet Minister for further information)
    Given her six years at the Home Office and that Mrs May set up this appalling system it seems unlikely that Mr Javid will be allowed to make the serious changes to policy, structure and ethos that Liberals would like to see.
    If Mr Javid isn’t able to make these changes then he should quit in due course and go public on the reasons. (Well, I am a fantasy and science fiction fan…)

  • Given that there is a three line whip on Tory MPs to prevent the ‘Why, How and When’ details of May’s ‘Hostile Environment’ policy documentation ever seeing the light of day it is clear that, as Mick Taylor implies, nothing will change!

  • Peter Hirst 4th May '18 - 3:31pm

    A fair, compassionate and transparent immigration system is what we should be aspiring towards. Fairness means that mistakes are rectified. Also, if there is true transparency, this will be an incentive for officials to work better, especially if it is rewarded rather than targets.

  • Richard Underhill 6th May '18 - 11:53am

    Have I Got News For You has reported Twitter (whatever that is)

  • Richard Underhill 16th May '18 - 3:33pm

    One would expect the top-of-the-office to brief the incoming secretary of State on his duties, such as signing deportation orders on convicted criminals. We can deduce that they have done so, because he has given estimated (approximate) figures for deportations and separate figures for those removed by civil servants without direct ministerial involvement. Those deported are banned from returning. The latter category can apply to FCO for a visa to return, as has been demonstrated in some Windrush cases: the visa applications were made but refused.
    Counting such cases as deportations would cause confusion, although the effect appears similar.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 31st May - 1:54pm
    Bangladesh experienced this crash in their primary industry quite early on in the Covid pandemic. I’m not sure why we couldn’t do a deal for...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 31st May - 1:33pm
    Geoege Kendall, I think you have hit on the right areas where attention needs to be focused. The Centre for Social Justice issued a good...
  • User AvatarAlison C 31st May - 12:56pm
    What a great idea. I was wondering how I could help out somewhere to keep workers in work. I thik i will try a box.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 31st May - 12:32pm
    Suzanne Fletcher 30th May '20 - 9:54am We checked by 'phone that vacuum cleaners were acceptable, and took in two, but they were dumped by...
  • User AvatarGwyn Williams 31st May - 12:24pm
    Thank you to @Gerald Vernon Jackson for explaining the current role of the Party in England. When 30 years ago we created a Federal Party...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 31st May - 12:24pm
    Antony Watts 31st May '20 - 8:06am So, should we stop building houses with chimneys?