Election court agrees to examine Oldham East slur leaflet

As we reported last month the Liberal Democrat candidate for Oldham East and Saddleworth was petitioning for a hearing of an election court, alleging a breach of the Representation of the People Act (1983).

The BBC now reports:

A court is to examine claims that a Labour Party election leaflet from former minister Phil Woolas linked an opponent to Muslim “extremists”.

An election court has agreed to hear the case brought by Liberal Democrat candidate Elwyn Watkins.

He claims Labour falsely portrayed him as taking “illegal” foreign donations.

The court could order a fresh election in the Oldham East and Saddleworth seat, which Mr Woolas won in May by just 103 votes and after two recounts.

Mr Watkins believes a Labour election leaflet portrayed him as courting votes from militant Muslims.

The leaflet was headlined: “Watkins accused of wooing extremist vote.”

Elwyn Watkins, Liberal Democrat candidate for Oldham East and Saddleworth in the 2010 General Election said,

I’m looking forward to the legal case, where I’ll be able to show my good character and I’ll be able to show that what was said is completely wrong.

You can hint and suggest things that put a question mark in people’s minds.

If I’d read those leaflets I don’t think I’d have voted for myself if I thought they were half-true.

You can read the full report here.

If the court orders a rerun of the Parliamentary election due to corruption, this will be the first time this has happened since 1911. (The Winchester election rerun of 1997 was due to a technicality.)

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    “Pensioners deserve that respect, as do younger people who will help fund the system and may one day depend on it.” Yes, just as current pensioners funde...
  • Nigel Orchard
    I welcome the announcement of this Review, particularly its proposed examination of the fairness, timeliness and consistency of the Party's complaints and disci...
  • Jana
    “ our Federal party Constitution makes clear that, as a party, we reject all discrimination and prejudice based on religion or belief and that we respect the ...
  • Chris Nicholson
    I am not sure where Theakes gets his information but Lambeth Lib Dems are not in cahorts ( or cahoots) with the Greens. We are not in coalition with the Greens ...
  • Pete Roberts
    There is another key issue that still needs to be resolved, namely how the party and indeed the legal system, deal with the intersection of protected characteri...