Electoral Commission says returning officers improving but doubts remain over the data

The elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission, has been mildly trumpeting the results of the latest survey of electoral registration work carried out across Great Britain by local councils.

The Electoral Commission’s news release says,

Electoral registration service improving but more work needed
Electoral registration services in Great Britain are improving ahead of the forthcoming elections and referendum on Thursday 5 May, but some can still do better, says a report by the Electoral Commission, the independent elections watchdog.

The Commission has published its annual assessment of performance by Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) across Great Britain. The report assesses how effectively EROs are delivering their duty to maintain complete and accurate electoral registers…

The Commission’s report shows that the vast majority of EROs have improved their services to voters over the three years since the Electoral Commission introduced performance standards.

However, the system for assessing electoral registration services is heavily dependent on self-classification by council staff and research last year by the Electoral Commission itself showed one third of Acting Returning Officers were wrongly assessing their own performance. It is therefore questionable how much faith should be placed in these latest figures which again depend on council staff classifying their own work correctly.

However, the responsibility for having such questionable data does not rest solely with the Commission itself. Despite the survey finding that as many as a third of checks were finding errors, I’ve not been able to find any Parliamentarians or journalists who have taken up this issue (though do let me know if I’ve missed an example). Nor has anyone taken up the case where marked registers lost were lost and votes counted up wrongly, but the Returning Officer was still judged to have met performance standards.

The Commission at least has done the research that raises questions. If no-one else wants to pursue those questions, even though the Commission is regularly the subject of media stories and is answerable to Parliament, then that is a more widely shared failing.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim
    Here is my answer - (600 words ish) - originally appeared in The Economist, reprinted by permission - https://timleunig.substack.com/p/what-to-do-about-fiscal-r...
  • George Thomas
    Residency can become more complex. For example, if my hypothetical sibling is working for the British armed forces stationed abroad but wants to donate to the L...
  • Chloe
    What your up against is voter apathy. So many only turn out to vote in a GE . Mayoral election turnouts hover around 30%. That's on a par with pcc's and in the ...
  • Jana
    I understand why some people believe we need to prevent Reform from getting donations that would allow it to match or even exceed the spending of the main parti...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I agree with David Vigar. While parts of the media have always had poor editorial standards. Conversely the BBC used to be quite good, but has declined signi...