Evan secures Parliamentary debate on Trafigura and libel laws

Lib Dem MP Evan Harris has secured a debate on libel law and the reporting of Parliamentary proceedings following Carter Ruck’s attempts last week to gag The Guardian from reporting details of a Parliamentary Question concerning Trafigura’s activities. (You can catch-up on LDV’s reporting of the issue here.)

The debate will take place today in Parliament’s Westminster Hall today, 21st October, from 2.30-4pm.

Explaining the purpose behind the debate, Evan says:

There is a lot of concern in Parliament and in the media over the impact of English law on freedom of expression, but the people who should be most concerned are the general public.

“Powerful interests are able to exploit our legal system in order to prevent public interest matters – such as the dumping of toxic waste, or the evidence for the benefit of chiropractice on children’s health – being discussed.”

“The Government needs to do something about this instead of letting the public continue to be blinded by secretive injunctions and draconian libel suits.”

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Helen Dudden
    Is this progress to saving the planet? It does not make sense that vast profits are made by utilities and are they invested in future energy productivity....
  • Mick Taylor
    Nigel Jones. Dealing with anti-semitism in the UK is nothing to do with the very real conflict in the Middle East and trying to drag Palestinian rights into it,...
  • Suzanne Fletcher
    I started by being very pleased about this article, that it is being said, and Ed has done it well. However when I got to the 3 main recommendations there was ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Cassie, I suppose you could argue that we quit our previous job without knowing what the terms and conditions would be of any new one. Or maybe that we end...
  • Richard David Denton
    ASOLUTELY YES ! We as a party ought to fully support this strike NEVER MIND PICKET LINE AMBIVALENCE FROM LABOUR AND FEARS OF BACK SLIDING SOFT TORY VOTERS IN ...