Fifty years and still the same problem

A genuinely hard problem, or one the large parties have an interest in not solving?

Whichever the truth is, political activists might find these comments have a ring of familiarity.

A far more serious problem, however, is the lack of any limitation on amounts which can be spent nationally and in the period between elections.

These amounts have now begun to dwarf the total sums spent on behalf of all candidates. In the period leading up to the 1959 election it has been estimated that the Conservative Party spent £468,000 on advertising alone, while over three times that amount was spent by business firms supporting the conservative cause.

National expenditure on this scale goes a long way to thwart the intention of Parliament in restricting the level of expenditure in constituencies. This has led to a growing demand for an enquiry, which has so far not been acceded to.

That’s R. L. Leonard writing in the early ’60s.

Although there are now notional limits on national expenditure, in reality the effect is to give agents and treasurers a headache rather than actually restricting political spending.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 18th Jan '10 - 12:47pm

    There is something to be said for the simple and brutal solution: completely ban the use of commercial advertising for politics. It would effectively force candidates to campaign by talking directly to their constituents (in person or via their supporters) or by appearing in (impartially run) public debates. I’m not completely sold on the idea, but it does have a certain appeal.

  • Malcolm Todd 19th Jan '10 - 9:26am

    Of course, we’d still be jiggered, in competition with Labour’s Union-employed paid support, and the Tories’ business friends paying for leaflet deliverers in droves, etc. Apart from that, I quite like the idea.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Judy Abel
    @Veronica I couldn’t agree with you more. So much environmental harm done just to save around 35 minutes on a railway journey is actually awful, not forgettin...
  • Judy Abel
    @Tristan - yes I am sure we could have used our oil money more wisely! On the water issue, sewage discharges have gone up massively - this is partly down to po...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Judy Abel "sovereign wealth fund" Yes I've long thought Britain missed a huge opportunity there. I don't know how much (if any) of the oil tax revenue...
  • Judy Abel
    @Tristan. Norway created a sovereign wealth fund from its oil revenues which could have bee done in the UK to support public services - but no the money was squ...
  • John C
    Donated....