Fifty years and still the same problem

A genuinely hard problem, or one the large parties have an interest in not solving?

Whichever the truth is, political activists might find these comments have a ring of familiarity.

A far more serious problem, however, is the lack of any limitation on amounts which can be spent nationally and in the period between elections.

These amounts have now begun to dwarf the total sums spent on behalf of all candidates. In the period leading up to the 1959 election it has been estimated that the Conservative Party spent £468,000 on advertising alone, while over three times that amount was spent by business firms supporting the conservative cause.

National expenditure on this scale goes a long way to thwart the intention of Parliament in restricting the level of expenditure in constituencies. This has led to a growing demand for an enquiry, which has so far not been acceded to.

That’s R. L. Leonard writing in the early ’60s.

Although there are now notional limits on national expenditure, in reality the effect is to give agents and treasurers a headache rather than actually restricting political spending.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 18th Jan '10 - 12:47pm

    There is something to be said for the simple and brutal solution: completely ban the use of commercial advertising for politics. It would effectively force candidates to campaign by talking directly to their constituents (in person or via their supporters) or by appearing in (impartially run) public debates. I’m not completely sold on the idea, but it does have a certain appeal.

  • Malcolm Todd 19th Jan '10 - 9:26am

    Of course, we’d still be jiggered, in competition with Labour’s Union-employed paid support, and the Tories’ business friends paying for leaflet deliverers in droves, etc. Apart from that, I quite like the idea.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Adam
    Yeah right. Remember when we were all told to go paperless to save the planet? How's that working out!?!...
  • cim
    @Nick Baird Why choose when it's probably both! @paul barker Indeed - there's no plausible way to power the "proposed" data centres, and it makes clear how...
  • paul barker
    The crucial point about AI is that it is entirely dependent on massive Data Centres. If we take the 300 Data Centres currently queuing to be connected to The ...
  • David Allen
    The Hugging Face incident is merely one of many. AI agents have read, digested, adopted, and improved upon all the evil, manipulative, deceptive tricks that hu...
  • Nick Baird
    Regarding the Hugging Face incident, surely that means either: 1) OpenAI are so incompetent that they failed to properly sandbox their own software, and ther...