Norman Fowler, a former chairman of the Conservative Party, writes for the Financial Times:
Public money already goes to the parties at Westminster but the prospect of increased state funding is guaranteed to provoke objections. Why should the taxpayer be forced to make a contribution to a party he or she hates? It is a powerful argument. I know – I have used it in the past.
The public needs to decide whether it is content with the present tarnished system where the suspicion remains that, politically, money talks. It also needs to decide whether there is any other way of preventing corruption in the process. Greater state funding would result in a more transparent and better regulated system but by itself it will not guarantee absolute probity. There is evidence that fundraisers have sought ways around whatever new rules have been introduced.
A tighter enforcement system should be accompanied by a new warning to the political parties that they should obey the rules or face the consequences. This system, however, would not eliminate the individual contribution. Sir Hayden proposed that matched funding would enable parties to receive £10 of public funding for each donation of £10 or more that they receive from anyone on the electoral register. The system could be capped but matched funding should act as an encouragement to the individual contributor.
I accept that there could scarcely be a worse financial climate to make the case for increased taxpayer support, even though the cost would be no more than £20m-£25m a year. But leaving the system unreformed will have its own consequences. If nothing is done it is only a matter of time before the issue once more explodes into scandal.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The street in Australia named after my great great grandfather
Lib Dems pick Richard Kilpatrick as candidate for the Greater Manchester Mayoral election
Matt Wardman
David Warren
Roland
David Raw
2 Comments
No doubt he would ensure that this would only be available to Labour, Conservative and Libdems.
Other parties such as Greens, SNP, Plaid, LPUK, UKIP and BNP would be excluded from such funding, passed off as irrelevant.
Just another way to obtain a pecuniary advantage at the expense of taxpayers.
State funding for political parties is never going to gain instant appeal. Why not campaign, instead, on a platform of state funding for democracy?
The State should pay to make sure the democratic process works well. This would mean support for candidates putting their views across to the electorate through free media access, free leaflet distribution, etc. It should mean more funded local events, televised debates, and party broadcasts during the immediate election period. Meanwhile billboards should be banned.
With all this support to get our voices properly heard and the issues well debated, we wouldn’t need to beg for actual money to go into party pockets, and nobody would need dodgy donors!