GLA shortlist announced

By | Wed 11th April 2007 - 3:44 pm

Available in the members forum.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Dan 11th Apr '07 - 4:19pm

    Not a very good way to kick off an election campaign by announcing your candidates in private.

    I assume at some point London Region will wish to publicise their shortlist, or have they become so secretive that we have to await the black smoke flying from the Cowley Street chimmney?

  • Liam 11th Apr '07 - 5:55pm

    ”
    The topic or post you requested does not exist

    ”

    Oh well…..

  • simon wilson 12th Apr '07 - 5:22pm

    the topic does not exist and I am logged in

  • Hywel Morgan 12th Apr '07 - 11:19pm

    I think a list of candidates to be candidates is more “not published” than private.

    I find it hard to believe that the names won’t leak out given they will be sent to x,000 London members over coming days. I can’t really see what could be done if someone then publicised them. What – the candidates are going to claim legitimate expectation of privacy? 🙂

    I think this takes you to the forum page http://tinyurl.com/3ab7xl

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    “If the purpose of an economy is not to do that, then what is the incentive for those at the bottom to remain engaged in the economy, democracy and even socie...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Peter Martin As far as I am concerned the terrorism issuue is not relevant to my point. My point is that the level of violence used against the police offic...
  • Simon McGrath
    "Over the very same years, the public wealth of the country fell from a positive £337 billion to minus £1 trillion." This is obviously nonsense "That is no...
  • Neil Hickman
    @David - Granted, by 1979 the "progressive" nature of the income tax system had become ridiculous. The top rate of income tax was 83% and you had an "investment...
  • Tom Reeve
    Thanks Jana and David for your comments. @Jana - if the purpose of an economy is to spread the benefits of economic growth fairly among the populace accordi...