Labour Party under fire for breaking Code of Conduct on postal voting

The Electoral Commission’s report into the November 2009 Parliamentary by-election in Glasgow North East has condemned the Labour Party for breaking the Code of Conduct on postal voting, saying the party repeatedly failed to process postal vote forms promptly.

The Code allows parties to distribute to the public forms for signing up to postal votes and to have them returned to a party address. This makes sense in circumstances such as the forms being in with a mailing which also asks for donations to the campaign where giving two different return addresses could result in items going to the wrong place and council staff having to send on political donations to the right address.

However, to guard against misuse the Code – whose provisions the Labour Party has been consulted on annually and each year said it consents to – requires such forms to be passed on by a political party within two working days of receipt.

In Glasgow North East this deadline was broken by the Labour Party and the Electoral Commission says that, “When the Commission reported the concerns that the party had unduly delayed the return of applications for postal votes to the ERO, his staff undertook a spot-check of those applications and discovered that more than 100 forms had been signed and dated by the elector more than a week earlier, and in some cases, more than one month earlier.”

The Labour Party has however defended its actions, with The Guardian reporting that, “The commission’s conclusions were vigorously challenged by the Labour party, which will be asking the commission to justify its report’s conclusions, a spokesman disclosed. He said the report had ignored the significant impact on the delivery of postal vote applications by the postal strike, which had seriously affected every party’s campaign, despite this being highlighted in meetings between Labour and commission officials.”

The Commission was also critical of the long delay by Labour before calling the by-election. “The procedures for calling a by-election are complex and in this instance led to voters being without an MP for nearly five months,” said Jenny Watson, Chair of the Electoral Commission. “The Electoral Commission believes the UK Parliament should consider how long a Westminster seat should be able to remain vacant to ensure voters can elect a new MP in a timely way.”

You can read the full report here:

Glasgow North East By-Election: Electoral Commission Report

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and Parliamentary by-elections.
Advert

6 Comments

  • I know of far worse things than this that Labour have done involving postal votes

  • Anthony Aloysius St 24th Feb '10 - 12:36am

    I don’t quite follow this. Surely it’s not to a party’s advantage to delay forwarding postal vote applications from its supporters?

    This seems to be evidence only of incompetence – and incompetence that tends to disadvantage the Labour party.

  • Foregone Conclusion 24th Feb '10 - 1:16am

    “Surely it’s not to a party’s advantage to delay forwarding postal vote applications from its supporters?”

    Except, of course, that potentially the Labour Party could send out postal vote applications to everyone, and then sieve out the Tories and Lib Dems, who will be ‘forgotten about’, whereas the Labour faithful will receive postal votes. I’m not alleging that’s what happened, in fact I would be surprised if that were the case, but that’s why the code of conduct is in place.

  • Anthony Aloysius St 24th Feb '10 - 1:22am

    “I would be surprised if that were the case”

    I’d be _amazed_ if any but the looniest Tories and Lib Dems sent their postal application form to the Labour party to forward to the local authority!

  • Anthony Aloysius St 24th Feb '10 - 9:36am

    Ah – so that’s what they were up to!

    I just wasn’t Machiavellian enough to work it out.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Catherine Jane Crosland
    Mark, thank you for this article. This is a subject that requires very great sensitivity, and I can see that it must, at times, be difficult for the editorial t...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Peter Martin "Giving out free TV licences to those who don’t need them is probably not the best use of resources" Now that over-75s don't qualify automatic...
  • Paul Barker
    On The Polls again - The Tory lead at the last Election was 12%, that went up to around 20% (The Brexit bounce) faded away to virtually nothing & then rose...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Martin, "These are votes more easily lost (particularly if the outcome is successful for us) than gained. " I don't understand what this mean...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Laurence, I’m going to do something unexpected, in that I agree with Brad. If the Scots want to do this, they should have the right to and the obligation...