Well, it’s a novel argument. But perhaps not terribly convincing.
The Observer today trails moves from Gordon Brown to bring in more nuclear power, build in areas that conservationists won’t like and expand Britain’s airports. His argument? That opposing such policies for environmental reasons linked to the planet’s long-term future is, er…, short-termist and opportunistic.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Liberalism must mean something again (Stephen O'Brien)
Andy Burnham has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to renew British democracy. He should take it. (Roz Savage MP)
Why the Lib Dem Defence Bonds plan is a bad idea (Nick Baird)
Vince Cable writes: Manchesterism and Localism (Vince Cable)
William Wallace writes: What do Liberal Democrats have to offer the “left behind”? (Lord William Wallace)
Violent drunk banned from booze after throwing flapjack at police officer's genitals having missed with Pot Noodle
Pontywood
DCMS logs off X: a second Whitehall exit
Ian Holm as Richard III in the BBC's Wars of the Roses from 1965
Liverpool Lib Dem boss accused of using "sex appeal to build fanbase" in cover shoot
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
Lib Dems return to winning ways in council by-elections
The Joy of Six 1542
Farage in trouble again?
Steve Trevethan 
David S 
Jeff 
Francis Chubb Francis Chubb 
One Comment
I don’t know. Environmental politics is as opportunist as all other areas of politics.
Environmental campaigners exaggerate risks and events to make things look bad. Politicians respond because they ‘must do something’. Unfortunately, the something can often come at great cost.
It is arguable that we’d be better off letting future generations deal with it, because they will be the ones who suffer, they will be richer (vastly so in all probability) and they will have better technology to deal with the problems.
In reality, I think its a trade off between acting now and leaving things to the future. It is too damaging to act now if it will impoverish future generations. Acting now in some cases will do more environmental damage too (biofuels for example).
Given the way technology is progressing, and oil prices are rising, it won’t be long until the best ways to generate electricity are green and aeroplanes use less fuel (modern ones already do).