Stinging rebuke for Great Ormond Street’s management in The Lancet

Writing in the latest edition of The Lancet, one of the world’s most respected medical journals, its editor Richard Horton says,

If GOSH’s [Great Ormond Street Hospital’s] management team had been in Wigan they would almost certainly have departed by now. Perhaps GOSH is just too important to be seen to fail. Even when a child dies. (The Lancet – free registration required)

The reason for his comment that had it been another hospital, the management team would have been sacked or resigned by now is the criticisms levelled at the hospital not only for its role in the death of Baby Peter but also its subsequent failure to hand over key evidence of its mistakes to one inquiry and the claim that it provided evidence to a second inquiry – only for that inquiry’s chair to flatly contradict Great Ormond Street’s claim.

Moreover, its Chief Executive Jane Collins avoided a General Medical Council investigation into her behaviour only by virtue of coming off the medical register and the hospital has finally after three years apologised for its treatment of a whistleblower in the Baby P case. Last year around half its top medical staff signed a letter of no confidence in its senior management.

The Lancet‘s editor says:

There are unanswered questions. Have the events that led to the death of Peter Connelly been fully and transparently investigated? Have the right lessons been learned? And have those who managed (and continue to manage) children’s services at GOSH and its associated facilities been held properly responsible for the quality of care they delivered? The answers to these three questions are the same—we don’t know. These uncertainties now rest with the Secretary of State for Health to resolve as a matter of urgency.

He also speculates that the reason for Great Ormond Street seeking to avoid criticism and failing to be open about events is that it is nearing its long-term quest for foundation hospital status – meaning that criticism of its leadership is the last thing the hospital wants at this moment. However, Andrew Lansley has the power to insist these questions and failings are fully investigated – if he chooses to.

UPDATE: Richard Morris has more on the story here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    We could end up gaining a considerable number of seats in our target areas & losing our deposit in many others ... I remember a time when we had a leader w...
  • Joseph Bourke
    I was in Dorking, Surrey yesterday. One of the blue wall seats in play. There is a banner across the high street that reads elections coming soon. In the area ...
  • john hall
    Thanks for your reply Mick. I have to say that you - along with many others - have swallowed Israeli fake new. Hamas did NOT use rape and beheading of babi...
  • Nigel Quinton
    Isn't stealing signs a criminal offence? Why are people not reporting them to the police?...
  • William Wallace
    Years ago, when the Conservatives still had activists who could deliver their own leaflets for them, I was skilled at extracting Tory leaflets half-hanging out ...