9 Comments

• Clegg's Candid Friend 13th Nov '08 - 11:36pm

  It’s quite misleading to describe this as a “library book ban”.

  As far as I know, there has never been any question of the book being banned from Hackney libraries, as your headline would suggest.

  Or as suggested by your no-doubt carefully phrased comment about Hackney “backing away from its original position, and talking about being happy to stock the book by Iain Sinclair in future”.

  In fact, the “original position” was the withdrawal of an invitation to hold an event to launch the book in a local library, and the reason the book isn’t stocked at the moment is that it hasn’t been published yet!

• Mark Pack 13th Nov '08 - 11:58pm

  CCF: I think you’re (wrongly) assuming that my second sentence was all about one point. It covers two, related points – one before the “and” and one after. Hackney Council *is* backing away from its original decision to ban the launch – hence the announcement that it will review its policy on who is or isn’t allowed to launch books in future. And it *is* saying that it will be willing to stock the book in future.

• Clegg's Candid Friend 14th Nov '08 - 12:47am

  I’m not assuming any such thing. It’s perfectly obvious what you’ve done here.

  Clearly the sentence was carefully constructed to give people the impression the book had originally been banned, without explicitly saying so.

  Just like “library book ban” in the headline.

  What’s the excuse for that? You can hardly claim, as a print journalist could, that there wasn’t room to write “ban on book launch in library”!

• Mark Pack 14th Nov '08 - 8:23am

  CCF: I’m surprised you’re so confident you know what I was thinking! But you’re mistaken. Indeed, if your claim was true I’d have hardly said “book launch” in the previous sentence, which is a pretty good clue as to what “original position” immediately after means 🙂 As for the headline – the story is about a ban involving a book and a library. No headline can give all the details of a story (unless it’s a very, very simple story!) but there’s the text of the story – and two links through to more details.

• Clegg's Candid Friend 14th Nov '08 - 9:23am

  “As for the headline – the story is about a ban involving a book and a library. No headline can give all the details of a story (unless it’s a very, very simple story!) …”

  But it’s clearly not about a “book ban”, is it? Would it really have been so hard to write “book launch ban” instead?

• David Allen 14th Nov '08 - 12:50pm

  Mark, do you think it is necessary, or wise, for public libraries that are funded by the taxpayer to get involved in commercial product launches for books? Especialy those which advocate a particular political point of view?

• Grammar Police 14th Nov '08 - 1:22pm

  @ David – but that wasn’t the reason Hackney withdrew its invitation to speak.

• Mark Pack 14th Nov '08 - 2:21pm

  David: in addition to what GP said, libraries have for decades been hosting book launches for local authors all round the country as part of their efforts to support and encourage a more bookish culture.

• David Allen 14th Nov '08 - 2:53pm

  Mark: Fair enough, if it’s novels, local history, whatever. But when it comes down to politics, or religion, shouldn’t we be cautious? If we launch a Conservative book today, what do we say when the BNP put in their application tomorrow?