Mark Pack

Have you seen a stranger page 3 in a political party’s policy document?

By | Thu 6th September 2007 - 11:18 pm

Reading Conservative policy documents seems to be getting a bit of a hobby of mine. It certainly has its highlights (such as the bit calling for a policy that, er…, is already happening, the spectacularly ill-timed mortgage policy, the lopsided priorities for tax cuts, the policy that ends up requiring MPs to be opted out of the Freedom of Information Act after all, the ten years out of date figures and the impressive ability to point four different ways on the same policy point).

And now I can unveil … the strange case of page three.

It’s in Inspiring British Teenagers, which, as Benedict Brogan points out, rather worries about British children being too bookish. I’m sure that’s what pensioners think all the time when they see hoodies: “Crikey, that young so-and-so looks like he spends too much time reading books and now I’m really scared he’s going to mug me.”

But that’s page sixteen. Page three is the one for me. Why? Well, it’s rather odd. You see, when a political party launches a policy document the normal form is to go to great lengths to emphasise how it is new – as that’s what makes it newsworthy. You’re not going to get much coverage if you launch a document saying, “hey, this is just boring old rehashed stuff from last time”.

Yet page three goes to great lengths to emphasise how the policy isn’t new, quoting instead four speeches from the last two years, headlining them “An idea 2 years in the making…” just to make the point.

It’s almost as if someone thought, “Oh dear. Conservatives launching a policy document talking about bringing back a form of national service is going to sound like a panicked lurch to the right and return to core votes strategy, so we had better try really hard to make it sound like it’s just old hat.”

Of course, there’s no way that would be the case is it?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Walker
    I’ve enjoyed this lively debate, thank you for all the comments. As people, our perspectives and conclusions will always be different. This reflects our diver...
  • Gill Travers
    Chris says "he harsh truth is that, unless we have a message that gives us an identity among those who don’t take a massive interest in politics but do at l...
  • David Raw
    "After all George Formby paid 19/6d in the £ on his income and still remained the greatest entertainer ever". Not that bad for a window cleaner !...
  • paul barker
    If we are going to attract new Voters, Young Voters & Women in particular, then we have to be prepared to annoy & appall some other Voters. Trying to pl...
  • Peter Wrigley
    I think Kira Collins is wrong. When Jo Grimond was leader he wrote an article in the Observer (I think it was in the very first edition of their weekend Magazi...