Have you seen a stranger page 3 in a political party’s policy document?

Reading Conservative policy documents seems to be getting a bit of a hobby of mine. It certainly has its highlights (such as the bit calling for a policy that, er…, is already happening, the spectacularly ill-timed mortgage policy, the lopsided priorities for tax cuts, the policy that ends up requiring MPs to be opted out of the Freedom of Information Act after all, the ten years out of date figures and the impressive ability to point four different ways on the same policy point).

And now I can unveil … the strange case of page three.

It’s in Inspiring British Teenagers, which, as Benedict Brogan points out, rather worries about British children being too bookish. I’m sure that’s what pensioners think all the time when they see hoodies: “Crikey, that young so-and-so looks like he spends too much time reading books and now I’m really scared he’s going to mug me.”

But that’s page sixteen. Page three is the one for me. Why? Well, it’s rather odd. You see, when a political party launches a policy document the normal form is to go to great lengths to emphasise how it is new – as that’s what makes it newsworthy. You’re not going to get much coverage if you launch a document saying, “hey, this is just boring old rehashed stuff from last time”.

Yet page three goes to great lengths to emphasise how the policy isn’t new, quoting instead four speeches from the last two years, headlining them “An idea 2 years in the making…” just to make the point.

It’s almost as if someone thought, “Oh dear. Conservatives launching a policy document talking about bringing back a form of national service is going to sound like a panicked lurch to the right and return to core votes strategy, so we had better try really hard to make it sound like it’s just old hat.”

Of course, there’s no way that would be the case is it?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ Gwyn Williams, Gwyn, you write, "The urgent issues of change in Westminster such as PR"............. Sorry, Gwyn, but I would have thought that a 26.4% inc...
  • Richard Cripps
    Having been "attacked" on social media for my political and social views (I am normally a LD voter) from time to time - with the attacks being personal rather t...
  • Jana
    @Tim Roger’s “ Jana. Please do not assume that everybody in the party is pro trans. Just oppose violence towards them.” I know you are correct on this...
  • paul barker
    Reform continue their slow decline in the Polls, where they stand a second time their Vote share mostly falls, they are losing Councillors steadily. Even the mo...
  • GWYN WILLIAMS
    Burnham's gradualist approach is similar to past Labour Governments. In 1964 Jim Griffiths was the first Secretary of State for Wales. In the 1970s the Royal Mi...