If the Democrat primaries were being run on first past the post (rather than allocating delegates in proportion to the votes won by the different Presidential candidates), then Hillary Clinton would now be the Democrat nominee for President, despite having won fewer votes overall.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
How housebuilding can tackle the cost of living crisis and boost growth (Rob Blackie)
-
The Independent View: Nobody falls in love with a manifesto (James Bradford)
-
Bridges Matter (Francis Chubb)
-
For disabled people, a simple game of football comes with a terrifying price tag: their benefits (Jean-François Burford)
-
Budget verdict: A missed opportunity to tackle intergenerational unfairness and give working people a tax breakk (Callum Robertson)
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Retro.1
-
The Joy of Six 1599
-
Europe's coffin-makers warn Chinese imports could be death knell for industry
-
Reform leader of Leicestershire County Council under pressure
-
Reform's first gain from the Lib Dems since May
-
Farage in hiding from the 'orange ninjas'
Recent Comments
Simon McGrath
The picture is in the article if put through an AI detector comes out as high probability AI generated...- Simon McGrath
@James, it is quite clearly to to pass itself off as associated with the Party by using the party name. The website is very odd. There are lots of strange b... 
Hywel
Also they don't identify who the data controller is, just say you will be notified about this if you sign up. When you go to sign up it asks for a number of bi...- Hywel
That whole site/family of sites is very very weird and feels like an AI bot got drunk and went off on one. Eg this is about Leeds as a dating location: "Kirkg... 
Jana
@Hywel “(Also – why is everyone white?)” Your comment persuaded me to look at the site and, as you point out, all the couples shown are white. They ar...
4 Comments
That’s a dubious claim. You are trying to compare apples and oranges. Obama did very well where state parties held caucuses, where the totaled votes cast were lower than in states which held primaries. In these states Clinton tended to do better overall. Had all states used the same electoral system then Obama may have received most votes. Why are you trying to talk up Hillary when Barack is evidently the candidate more aligned with Liberal Democrat positions than Labour???
B. Stearn:
I think you miss hte major point here – Mark is pointing out that Clinton has less votes, but if FPTP had been used she’d have won.
Its pointing out the way that FPTP can produce absurd outcomes rather than talking up Clinton.
Actually the delegates don’t seem to be allocated in proportion to the votes won by the different Presidential candidates, because if they were, Hillary would have more delegates from Nevada and Texas, where she won the popular vote, but now Obama has more delegates from both states. I understand, that they actually use a sort of first past the post, but they have now breaken the states to sort-of one-member constituencies, whereas previously the winner got all delegates of the state.
NN unfortunately it ain’t that simple… In fact just about each state uses a slightlky different system, some have caucuses and some polls and some both and some whole state and some sub divisions – tere is some very good explanatory information via abc.com’s political pages – facinating stuff but the Dems still don’t have one candidate!
I suspect what’s keeping Hillary going is the GE opinion poll analysis that she has a better chance of beating McCain and the belief that this could swing the superdelegates and the convention vote.. Have a look at:
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
facinating stuff if you are interested in psephology and bear in mind that the Novemeber poll is for state votes in an electoral colege not for the president… so that’s another quirky system…