How ten years has changed them

There’s a classic Tony Blair quote that’s been doing the rounds ever since Labour started promoting ID cards:

At the Labour party conference in 1995, Tony Blair demanded that ‘instead of wasting hundreds of millions of pounds on compulsory ID cards as the Tory Right demand, let that money provide thousands more police officers on the beat in our local communities.’[12] (Wikipedia)

This quote is wonderfully double-edged as it shows the strange dance both the Labour Party and Conservatives have done on the issue since 1995.  The Tories were pursuing an ID scheme in 1995 which got dropped by the Labour party when they came into power in 1997.

By 2005, the Labour Party had changed sides, and brought in a new bill for ID cards worse than anything the Tories had intended, which the Conservatives supported.

By 2006, the Tories had changed sides, and David Cameron decided to oppose the new scheme, bringing both the Tories and the Labour party to a complete reversal of their positions in one handy decade.

Now a new quote has emerged from a Lib Dem on Cix transcribing the then shadow chancellor Gordon Brown speaking to Labour conference in Blackpool in 1996.

Labour priorities will not be the Tory priorities. A Labour chancellor
will not waste money on nursery vouchers; on the Quango state; on tax
reliefs for boardroom excesses in the privatised monopolies; on
indiscriminate handouts of public money to under-valued rail companies
that should never have been privatised in the first place; and a Labour
chancellor will not waste money on consultancy fees for the privatisation
of the Post Office. The Post Office will remain as it is, run in the
public sector as a public service.

A Labour chancellor and a Labour treasury will not permit tax reliefs to
millionaires in off-shore havens. We will end the situation where
millionaires can pay no tax.

Isn’t it strange that a Brown government should be so different to a Brown opposition?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Mark Wright 22nd Mar '08 - 9:57pm

    Unbelievable. SO, were they lying through their teeth, or have they all utterly changed their minds?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 25th May - 1:29am
    Joseph, Philip Alston states in his report, “the fact that a fifth of the population of the United Kingdom lives in poverty, despite record employment...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 25th May - 1:29am
    Michael BG, it is not a question of differing on how much the economy can grow by each year and how much extra government revenue...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 25th May - 12:34am
    David Raw, I am not against higher taxes. I just think Land Value Tax on communaly produced increments in rental values is a more effective...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 24th May - 10:41pm
    John (Marriott), Yes I do like getting my hands dirty. And have done regularly. I do want us to be part of a Government again....
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th May - 10:06pm
    Joseph, It is really good to read that you support that basic rates of benefit should be increased to the poverty level as defined by...
  • User AvatarDavid Chadwick 24th May - 9:05pm
    Thank you Bernard. I studied in Den Haag for three years and several of my friends are active within D66. They’re a well-organised, friendly bunch.