iwantareferendum: are they censoring their own poll or have they made up the results?

A curiosity from the “I want a referendum” campaign. Their news release today claims:

I Want a Referendum today releases an ICM poll of 1,000 people who voted Liberal Democrat at the last General Election … The poll also finds that if only one question is to be asked then Liberal Democrat voters would prefer a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty to a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU.

And yet the full tables from ICM contain no such question, which as far as I can see leaves only two possibilities:

a. They’ve made up or got horribly wrong their own poll results in their own press release, or

b. They’re keeping hidden some of the poll answers (though, as the press release has mentioned them under the British Polling Council rules, ICM should release them).

Anyway, if you want to see poll results which do really answer the “what sort of referendum would you want?” question, see the results of the poll from MORI issued by the Liberal Democrats today. They show the public in favour by 2:1 of having an in/out referendum rather than a Lisbon Treaty referendum.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and Polls.
Advert

6 Comments

  • I got polled by ICM over the weekend and they definitely did ask the question…

  • I think by cutting and pasting only that you are taking the words out of context.

    The press release actually says:

    “The poll also finds that if only one question is to be asked then Liberal Democrat voters would prefer a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty to a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU. In a MORI poll released today by the Liberal Democrats, just over half (54%) of voters support a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU. But the ICM poll of Liberal Democrats shows that over two thirds (67%) support a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.”

    If you actually reproduce the text in full it makes it clear what is really being said. Cutting out of context is very dangerous!

  • Martin Pantling 5th Mar '08 - 5:51pm

    All of this is irrelevant Mark, because Dave H is unfortunately on the mark.

    Our MPs may not line up to lose their front bench posts, but the fact remains that most people don’t believe or accept the line that the Treaty is radically different from the proposed Constitution.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jack
    David, the tone is unnecessary. I made no such claim about the Mayor's powers. This is a matter of principle and I can't support someone for a candidature of th...
  • Laurence Cox
    @Jack It was Lauren Edwards' advocacy of using the Parliament Acts to force through the Bill that convinced me that Sarah, and others including our Party leade...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Jack I was reading https://tinyurl.com/dj4nycr2 which if accurate shows Sarah Olney's contributions to the 2025 debaite. It seems to me that she was prim...
  • David Raw
    @ Jack Jack, could you tell me which particular power the Mayor of London has to allow them to exercise over the Assisted Dying Bill ?...
  • Jack
    Never mind, I've changed my mind. She voted against the Assisted Dying Bill at every opportunity including today - I hadn't realised that. That is her absolute ...