Julian Huppert MP calls for Digital Economy Act rethink

This week Julian Huppert tabled Early Day Motion 1913: Disconnection of Users from the Internet, which calls for a rethink on last year’s Digital Economy Act.

From the Register:

A Liberal Democrat MP is demanding a repeal of the Digital Economy Act having tabled an early day motion in Parliament yesterday, which so far has gained nine signatures from across the political spectrum.

Julian Huppert wants the UK government to debate the issue in the House of Commons. Signatories include Labour MPs Tom Watson and Eric Joyce as well as Tory backbencher Peter Bottomley.

The Lib Dem MP has made similar demands in the past about the DEA Act – which was rushed through the Palace of Westminster during the final days of the previous Labour government.

On this occasion Huppert used the recent report penned by Frank de la Rue entitled ‘Special Rapporteur on Free Expression’ (pdf) that was issued by the UN Human Rights Council, which highlighted concerns surrounding certain elements detailed in the 2010 Act.

The motion reads:

That this House welcomes the report of the Special Rapporteur on Free Expression, Frank de la Rue, to the Human Rights Council of United Nations; notes that he is `alarmed’ by the Digital Economy Act 2010 and other three strikes disconnection laws and that he considers them to be a violation of freedom of expression; further notes the report’s recommendation to repeal laws permitting disconnection of users from the internet; further notes that La Rue emphasises that web censorship should never be delegated to private entities, and that corporations should only act to block and censor with the authority of a judicial process; and calls on appropriate Parliamentary Select Committees and the Government to re-examine new website blocking proposals from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, as part of the Home Office’s Prevent strategy, and in sections 3 to 18 of the Digital Economy Act 2011 in the light of this report.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 17th Jun '11 - 6:44pm

    Very disappointed as the lack of LibDem MPs signing the motion so far, surely there should be more names on there…

    Except in rare cases, EDMs move very slowly; they last for the entire session of Parliament so MPs don’t feel obliged to react to them quickly – or pay attention to them at all, given the rate at which they are bombarded with the things. Give it a couple of weeks, and then if your MP hasn’t signed it, write them a short letter.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • GWYN WILLIAMS
    Normally I skip Matthew's article but today I am in agreement except for his extreme views about tennis. The point Peter Martin makes about Wales is a fair one....
  • Graham Evans
    The problem with Ed Davey's speech that it leaves too many questions unanswered. Aspiration has its role, but at some point the party has to come up with some d...
  • Nigel Quinton
    Thanks Iain for another cautionary tale about the perils of assuming Burnham will be some sort of progressive messiah. He is not the messiah, but then he is not...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Yes, there should be a drive to build more council houses, social housing rather than just 'affordable homes', but the powers and funding should go to local cou...
  • Peter Martin
    " Britain has been governed as though every problem can be solved from Whitehall. " Possibly, but do the people of Wales think that moving much th...