Just imagine if you’d got over one million new poster sites

So today the Guardian officially, and surprisingly, came out in support of the Lib Dems for the coming general election. Most of us who are resolved to ‘Keep Calm & Clegg On’ are happy to recognise that newspaper endorsements – certainly by left-of-centre newspapers – do not swing elections.

But, equally, it would be wrong to dismiss the Grauniad’s conversion to the Lib Dem cause as irrelevant. For a start, it is the first time since 1974 that the paper has unreservedly supported the party. That alone is a real fillip to activists.

It’s good for morale, therefore. But it is also good for credibility. For a long time, a newspaper endorsement for the Lib Dems has been the Cinderella at the ball. The Indy has let us get our hands all over it but never allowed us to go all the way. The Guardian has flirted but made sure we keep our hands to ourselves: until now. Now, at long last, Nick Clegg’s party is being taken seriously.

And then there’s this. At the last estimate the Guardian’s readership totalled some 1.15 million. Today they will all be reading that they should, in their paper’s opinion, vote Lib Dem. Does that mean they will? Of course not. Just as putting up a Lib Dem poster doesn’t guarantee your neighbour will vote for the party either. But it does mean they’ll see you support the party. Which does mean they will, in turn, think about whether they might also.

It’s silly to over-estimate the importance of newspapers at election time. But let’s not dismiss their endorsements either. In effect, the party just gained over a million new poster sites. That makes me happy, at any rate.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election and Op-eds.
Advert

8 Comments

  • This is quite a big deal, as it keeps the “big mo” and the narrative going that the Lib Dems are replacing Labour.

  • Silent Hunter 1st May '10 - 10:13am

    Er?

    The Observer is the Saturday newspaper Philip . . . The Guardian is the weekly.

    Still, never mind, it is a bit early on a Saturday morning to be completely awake. ;o) (yawn)

    But I take your point about it being a Philip to morale ;o) . . . er? . . . Fillip.

  • Er…. the Guardian is the weekday + Saturday newspaper and the Observer is published on Sundays.

  • Cllr Patrick Smith 1st May '10 - 11:59am

    I rate the support from the Guardian`s Editorial Team for Nick Clegg`s Liberal Democrats as vitally important and persuasive to their wide raging spectrum of readers in this General Election 2010.

    The Guardian has digested long enough the shortcomings and failures on the Economy,Health and Education and Public Services since 1974 and know that it time for a change that it is only the Lib.Dems.who will make a real difference.

    There is also the added carrot of proper and transformational to British Democracy `Electoral Reform’ i.e. STV and only Liberal Democrats are committed to it,root and branch.

    Only with Nick Glegg as our next Prime Minister can we make certain that voters have the chance to vote for a fairer voting system next time.

    The Guardian knows that Britain desperately needs a national referendum,to provide the UK with a much closer proximity between the voters and their chosen Party and who is elected and why?

  • George Kendall 1st May '10 - 3:49pm

    You’re right we shouldn’t dismiss its importance, but a million poster sites? More like a million extra leaflets going through people’s doors. Mind you – that many leaflets is very useful.

    Apart from the direct exposure, there are other benefits.

    By announcing the switch a week before polling day, when many assumed it wouldn’t happen, it’s become a bigger news story than it would otherwise. So thanks, Guardian. Some have said too little too late, not me.

    It’s an endorsement we can quote in our leaflets.

    It’s been quoted in other newspapers, including Tory ones, that the Guardian has switched from Labour to LibDem.

    It gives extra credibility to us, particularly with left-leaning voters, which increases the chance of us holding off a Labour recovery, or even squeezing Labour a bit. (Which, of course, is why Tory papers are telling their readership about this).

    And, perhaps most important, the Guardian is read by other journalists, print and broadcast. It’ll increase our credibility among them, and may encourage the rest of the media to take use more seriously.

    But I think most of the benefit will be longer term. A little more media exposure out of elections, and that the Guardian will be more likely to defend us, when we are are ignored or misrepresented in the wider media.

    All these benefits are marginal, but if each results in an extra three votes in a marginal constituency, it could win us an extra seat.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker Has the party costed the amount for changing to the arrangement you describe, Daniel, and what amount does it come to ? For my part I wo...
  • David Raw
    Mick Taylor is correct, and I well remember the late Dr Michael Winstanley (the then Liberal MP for Cheadle) giving the Minister, David Ennals, a torrid time in...
  • Kira Collins
    @Daniel Walker Thank you for that information. I did not know that our position was that laws for the whole of England should be made by an indirectly elected ...
  • Kira Collins
    @Richard Flowers “Sex assigned at birth” just means a doctor looked and gave an answer. Possibly a well informed answer by a trained professional. But it�...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "calls for the regions of England to have similar powers to Scotland, except for a few all-England areas of law which would be decided on by an English Chamber ...