Ken Clarke’s withering dismissal of David Cameron’s policy on the Human Rights Act as “largely gesture politics” on The Westminster Hour on Sunday has gone largely without comment so far. So here’s a comment: crikey.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- The Falklands are under threat again and we can’t rely on America to save us
- Defining our future in Burnham Britain
- “Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did?
- William Wallace writes: The case for higher taxes
- Mathew on Monday: Ann Widdecombe, robust debate and the need to disagree agreeably
Search
Op-eds
-
Mathew on Monday: Burnham has made a promising start. Now comes the hard part (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Orange with Bits (Brendan Roberts)
-
If Andy Burnham isn’t the Messiah… Good (Roz Savage MP)
-
Vince Cable writes: The rebirth of council housing (Vince Cable)
-
Britain should confront history honestly, not selectively (Gavin Stollar)
-
Labour councillor joins Lib Dems in Portsmouth
-
Andy Burnham's Big Promises - Now Comes the Difficult Part
-
Péter Magyar will ask Judit Polgár to become president of Hungary
-
After Dark podcast on the R101 airship disaster
-
After the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we must all be more careful of the language we use in political life
-
Burnham starts with the low-hanging fruit
-
Soho Parish primary: Without this school it's all just tourists, isn't it?
-
The Joy of Six 1550
-
Political history points against early general elections
-
Working 9 to 5
Recent Comments
Jana
“ Democratise Lib Dem Lords appointments” A brilliant idea. I hope you suggestion leads to a constitutional amendment for next Party conference....
Peter Martin
The Labour Party has, at least for many years, been full of those who decline to call themselves Socialist but will, just about, accept they are Social Democra...
John Kelly
Let’s hope the Palestinian elections scheduled for later this year do go ahead - they are indeed long overdue. The last attempt to hold elections was frustra...
Ruth Bright
@chriscory 👍...
Geoff Reid
We should avoid too much time time trying to analyse Labour's problems. That's the Guardian's job! However there is much in Brendan's approach to help us sort o...
2 Comments
But isn’t the Human Rights Act basically the same text as the European Convention on Human Rights? In the same way the Lisbon Treaty and EU constitution are basically the same text. Yet Dave doesn’t like the HRA, but is ok with the ECHR.
The ECHR was drafted by English lawyers in the late 1940s in order to police the behaviour of European governments, who were not at the time noted for their respect for human rights. It was not envisaged that the ECHR would ever be enforceable in the United Kingdom – the common law was assumed to be a sufficient guarantor of basic standards of good government.
Tories don’t like anything perceived to emanate from Europe, and they don’t like people they consider undeserving having enforceable rights. But that doesn’t stop Tories using the language of rights (and indeed the HRA) when it is rich people whose rights are threatened (such as people who hunt with hounds, and landowners who collect ground rents without providing a service).
For Cameron, opposition to the HRA is all about appeasing social authoritarians in his own Party, and throwing a bit of “red meat” to the Eurosceptics.
Cameron, himself, has said he is in favour of enforceable human rights, as long as they don’t come from Europe.
The ECHR has done a good job. It stopped the flogging of school children, it enabled gays to serve in the military, it removed the ability of politicians to interfere in sentencing. Conversely, it blew resounding rasberries at the Countryside Alliance and the Duke of Westminster – a jolly good thing by any standard.