Ken Clarke’s withering dismissal of David Cameron’s policy on the Human Rights Act as “largely gesture politics” on The Westminster Hour on Sunday has gone largely without comment so far. So here’s a comment: crikey.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- A plea from a member – more ambition and less equine pacification please…
- Is Ed Davey toast?
- We need a healthy and free leadership debate
- Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for
- The Independent View: The halfway house nobody wants to live in
Search
Op-eds
-
We need a healthy and free leadership debate (Rosemary Runswick)
-
Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for (Mathew Hulbert)
-
The decapitation strategy (Michael Taylor)
-
Welcome (belatedly) to my day: 12 October 2026 – a leadership challenge, or a challenge to the leadership?… (Mark Valladares)
-
Is Ed Davey toast? (Caron Lindsay)
Senedd bans poem by Wales National Poet
"A little heaven here on earth": Launde Abbey in Leicestershire
Recent Comments
Steve Trevethan
Might an associated root problem be a continuing/continuous lack of attention attracting/demanding “headline” policies which would benefit all of our societ...
Ruth Bright
@Peter Davies, a real question, not a criticism, how do you know we are consolidating well in all 72 held seats? I can think of several PPCs who are working ...
Peter Davies
Al Pinkerton, the party's Europe spokesman, told the BBC there had been a frank exchange of views during the meeting, but Sir Ed's willingness to make changes h...
Tristan ward
@David Allan I don’t understand why you are misrepresenting David position on raising the level of personal allowances by saying they are paid for by the m...
expats
Zionism is racism; plain and simple.. Just read the words of Theodor Herzl (the founder of modern Zionism) and Ben Gurion (the 'Father of Israel).. What is hap...
2 Comments
But isn’t the Human Rights Act basically the same text as the European Convention on Human Rights? In the same way the Lisbon Treaty and EU constitution are basically the same text. Yet Dave doesn’t like the HRA, but is ok with the ECHR.
The ECHR was drafted by English lawyers in the late 1940s in order to police the behaviour of European governments, who were not at the time noted for their respect for human rights. It was not envisaged that the ECHR would ever be enforceable in the United Kingdom – the common law was assumed to be a sufficient guarantor of basic standards of good government.
Tories don’t like anything perceived to emanate from Europe, and they don’t like people they consider undeserving having enforceable rights. But that doesn’t stop Tories using the language of rights (and indeed the HRA) when it is rich people whose rights are threatened (such as people who hunt with hounds, and landowners who collect ground rents without providing a service).
For Cameron, opposition to the HRA is all about appeasing social authoritarians in his own Party, and throwing a bit of “red meat” to the Eurosceptics.
Cameron, himself, has said he is in favour of enforceable human rights, as long as they don’t come from Europe.
The ECHR has done a good job. It stopped the flogging of school children, it enabled gays to serve in the military, it removed the ability of politicians to interfere in sentencing. Conversely, it blew resounding rasberries at the Countryside Alliance and the Duke of Westminster – a jolly good thing by any standard.