Ken Clarke’s withering dismissal of David Cameron’s policy on the Human Rights Act as “largely gesture politics” on The Westminster Hour on Sunday has gone largely without comment so far. So here’s a comment: crikey.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
What does a Lib Dem “trans activist” look like? (Caron Lindsay)
-
Winning back a generation starts with fixing the broken student loan system (Tom Gordon MP)
-
Welcome to my day: 21 September 2026 – time to clean up our politics? (Mark Valladares)
-
What I would have said about homeless children at Conference (Suzanne Fletcher)
-
Caron’s kitchen table diary (Caron Lindsay)
-
Lord Bonkers' Diary: Very much against buttocks
-
My view on a bland Lib Dem conference
-
The ruins of Derwent church emerge from Ladybower Reservoir
-
Fascism?
-
Lord Bonkers' Diary: You're unlikely to be there when you get there
-
GUEST POST Reform and Labour are losing councillors fast
-
Farage's plan for a Trump satellite state?
Recent Comments
Steve Trevethan
Thank you for a bravely honest article! Might the “leadership” which took the L. D party into enforced student debts/loans have been confused about the i...
David Le Grice
Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
Jack
Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
Geoff Reid
Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....
Hywel
Important point there Paul. For all the angst about 'lack of cut through' that has pretty much been the case for most of the time the LIb Dems existed except f...
2 Comments
But isn’t the Human Rights Act basically the same text as the European Convention on Human Rights? In the same way the Lisbon Treaty and EU constitution are basically the same text. Yet Dave doesn’t like the HRA, but is ok with the ECHR.
The ECHR was drafted by English lawyers in the late 1940s in order to police the behaviour of European governments, who were not at the time noted for their respect for human rights. It was not envisaged that the ECHR would ever be enforceable in the United Kingdom – the common law was assumed to be a sufficient guarantor of basic standards of good government.
Tories don’t like anything perceived to emanate from Europe, and they don’t like people they consider undeserving having enforceable rights. But that doesn’t stop Tories using the language of rights (and indeed the HRA) when it is rich people whose rights are threatened (such as people who hunt with hounds, and landowners who collect ground rents without providing a service).
For Cameron, opposition to the HRA is all about appeasing social authoritarians in his own Party, and throwing a bit of “red meat” to the Eurosceptics.
Cameron, himself, has said he is in favour of enforceable human rights, as long as they don’t come from Europe.
The ECHR has done a good job. It stopped the flogging of school children, it enabled gays to serve in the military, it removed the ability of politicians to interfere in sentencing. Conversely, it blew resounding rasberries at the Countryside Alliance and the Duke of Westminster – a jolly good thing by any standard.