Ken Clarke’s withering dismissal of David Cameron’s policy on the Human Rights Act as “largely gesture politics” on The Westminster Hour on Sunday has gone largely without comment so far. So here’s a comment: crikey.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
How Liberal Democrats can ride Britain’s youth wave on the pro-EU shift (Rupinder Singh)
-
Just growth by lowering deadweight losses through tax (Tony Vickers)
-
Local democracy should not be an excuse to stop building homes (Massimo Ricciuti)
-
The need for a nationally relevant message (Mark Corner)
-
Chris Coghlan MP writes…SEND reform must put children with complex needs at the centre; not treat them as an afterthought (Chris Coghlan MP)
-
Methodism at Horton, Gower
-
A promotional film for Northampton from 1965
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Christmas gift ideas for your political friends
-
Lib Dems win this week's local council by-election
-
GUEST POST Rediscovering "proper Grimond Liberalism"
-
Mixed messages on smart glasses
Recent Comments
PM
If Brexit is the cause of all our problems in the UK, what is the cause of the similar, or even worse, problems in France, Germany, Belgium, Italy etc? The ...
David S
Even if one's conclusion after examining all the complexities of the Civil War (which is a good deal more than "monarchy vs. democracy") is that Cromwell was a ...
Pawel Urbanski
Much-needed piece. You are right that young people are the audience, but I am not sure Europe is the way in. The polling you quote shows they already agree with...- Pawel Urbanski
Strong argument, and I agree with the direction. A couple of thoughts from someone who runs small shops. For me, deadweight loss is not a foreign concept. It is... 
Truthspeak
Of course ,it should be gotten rid of. Cromwell was a tyrant, a brute and a disgrace for any nation,in any age. The articlee excellently covered the full breadt...
2 Comments
But isn’t the Human Rights Act basically the same text as the European Convention on Human Rights? In the same way the Lisbon Treaty and EU constitution are basically the same text. Yet Dave doesn’t like the HRA, but is ok with the ECHR.
The ECHR was drafted by English lawyers in the late 1940s in order to police the behaviour of European governments, who were not at the time noted for their respect for human rights. It was not envisaged that the ECHR would ever be enforceable in the United Kingdom – the common law was assumed to be a sufficient guarantor of basic standards of good government.
Tories don’t like anything perceived to emanate from Europe, and they don’t like people they consider undeserving having enforceable rights. But that doesn’t stop Tories using the language of rights (and indeed the HRA) when it is rich people whose rights are threatened (such as people who hunt with hounds, and landowners who collect ground rents without providing a service).
For Cameron, opposition to the HRA is all about appeasing social authoritarians in his own Party, and throwing a bit of “red meat” to the Eurosceptics.
Cameron, himself, has said he is in favour of enforceable human rights, as long as they don’t come from Europe.
The ECHR has done a good job. It stopped the flogging of school children, it enabled gays to serve in the military, it removed the ability of politicians to interfere in sentencing. Conversely, it blew resounding rasberries at the Countryside Alliance and the Duke of Westminster – a jolly good thing by any standard.