Kennedy speaks out on Megrahi

While Nick Clegg has publicly disagreed with the SNP Scottish executive’s decision to release convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi, former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy has joined David Steel in declaring his belief that the decision was the right one. Charles’s local paper the Ross-shire Journal reports his views:

The Justice Secretary faced an unenviable decision, in which neither of two practical options represents a good outcome. The whole tragic, tangled web of Pan Am Flight 103 raises profound issues of principle and of process.

“The most regrettable aspect of what has happened is that the appeal was withdrawn, and there is now no clear route to try to resolve all the doubts which surround the Lockerbie bombing and Mr Al-Megrahi’s conviction.

“Mr Al-Megrahi has always maintained his innocence, and there are few who believe we have established a complete and truthful account of what happened and why. For the relatives of those who lost their lives, that is the bare minimum which justice requires.

“Mr Al-Megrahi is dying, and the Justice Secretary was required to find a balance between justice and compassion in these circumstances. It was his judgement as Minister that compassion was appropriate. It is not surprising that some disagree very strongly given the scale of the atrocity committed, but I think the decision was probably the right one even if it was not necessarily taken in the right way.

“This is not a party political matter, and it should not really be an international political matter either. It is a question of justice, rightly taken by the Scottish Justice Secretary, and for which he has rightly been held to account by MSPs with a full range of opinions in the Scottish Parliament.”

Meanwhile Lib Dem shadow foreign secretary Ed Davey has demanded once again that Gordon Brown “come clean” about the Government’s involvement in Mr Al Megrahi’s release, following the claims by Colonel Gaddafi’s son, Saif, that the prisoner transfer agreement negotiated between Libya and the UK was aimed at Megrahi and linked to talks on trade and oil:

Far too many questions remain unanswered about meetings between Brown, Mandelson and the Libyans. Tony Blair’s dealings are clearly still casting a long shadow, and must also be explained in full. If Gordon Brown’s conscience is clear, he should have no problem with making public all the details concerning these murky dealings.”

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Nick Clegg:
    “The most regrettable aspect of what has happened is that the appeal was withdrawn, and there is now no clear route to try to resolve all the doubts which surround the Lockerbie bombing and Mr Al-Megrahi’s conviction.”

    Err, no, there are at least two clear routes for establishing justice.

    1. If Megrahi is guilty, it is evident that he did not act alone. Identification of co-conspirators?

    2. If Megrahi is innocent, somebody else did it.

    Megarhi’s absence from any further investigation is largely inconsequential. He was an uncooperative witness, so any testimony would have been useless anyway.

  • Oops, should have quoted Kennedy.

  • Andrew Duffield 28th Aug '09 - 9:35pm

    We should be calling for a full public enquiry NOW, and backing the UK Families of Flight 103 in their quest for justice as we did with the Gurkhas. Pointing fingers at the SNP and/or Gordon Brown can be left to the Tories. Such nonsense is a pathetic side-show compared to getting to the truth. Nick (and Ed Davey) should heed our former leaders and call for Government to get a grip on the issue of what REALLY happened over Lockerbie. The victims’ families deserve nothing less – and certainly much better than what we’ve seen and heard so far, Messrs Steel and Kennedy excepted.

  • Was there a miscarriage of justice?
    Did the UK Government do a deal because of oil and investments in Libya?
    Who really bombed the plane and murdered hundreds of innocent human beings?

    Why is this World such a mess; full of devious self-obsessed, self-serving people?

  • Andrew Duffield’s point sounds good but does he really think that there is any prospect of getting to the truth of what happened? It seems incredibly unlikely to me. Moreover it seems exceedingly improbable that he acted alone. If Mr Al Magrahi had died in prison he would have become a martyr with a world wide reception – not just in Libya. Huw Dawson has a better point. There was nothing to be gained except placating the USA (if that is truly a gain) by keeping him in prison. I think Nick has taken the wrong stance on this one & that David Steele & Charles Kennedy have it about right.

  • Congratulations to Charles Kennedy for coming close to acknowledging that Al-Megrahi is innocent and that his conviction was part of a stitch-up orchestrated by the United States government. It’s a pity that Nick Clegg was unable to summon up the same degree of moral courage.

One Trackback

  • By Haggis, Neeps and Liberalism #7: The Megrahi Documents on Sun 6th September 2009 at 1:24 am.

    […] Megrahi case has ripped apart the peace of the Scottish Parliamentary recess, with even some former Lib Dem leaders taking a differing view to our leader in Holyrood. Today the UK Government and Scottish Parliament have released papers […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to           show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Charley
    Bit of a straw man there Mick given at no point was anyone seeking to force their views on anyone else. Asking someone what their views are is not the same as i...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    Andrew Appreciate your response. I understand. My view though is your opinion and mine, or Mick's, is as valid as any other. Young middle aged, middle aged, ...
  • matt
    As much as I want to see Boris go for his blatant disregard for the rules and failing to stand in solidarity with the Public. And the fact that he is a weak Pr...
  • Andrew Hickey
    Michael Taylor: "FGM could never be tolerated in our party, This clearly violates the harm principle." So does forced pregnancy. So does taking away the rig...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Thanks to Frank W for pointing out the inherent dangers of triumphalism and letting ourselves be distracted by the "showbiz" of politics. Might we work to deve...