Kramer urges Councils to make use of enhanced powers to check taxi drivers’ backgrounds

The Standard reports that Transport Minister Susan Kramer has written to Councils across England to urge them to take advantage of enhanced powers to check on the backgrounds of taxi drivers. 

Transport minister Baroness Kramer is writing to Transport for London and town halls across the country urging them to make “full use” of new powers to probe the background of individuals applying for taxi licences.

“People need to feel safe when using a taxi or private hire vehicle,” she told The Standard. “We have made it easier for local authorities to carry out checks on people who want to drive taxis or private hire vehicles.

“These checks should ensure that violent and sexual criminals aren’t allowed behind the wheel of a taxi.”

Ministers have sought to strengthen the system by encouraging town halls to require enhanced, rather than standard, checks on all mini cab and taxi drivers.

Standard checks by the Disclosure and Barring Service cover spent and unspent convictions, cautions, reprimands and final warnings.

Enhanced scrutiny includes any additional information held by the police that is considered relevant.

As much as I want to be sure that those taking home vulnerable, possibly drunk people, have had rigorous background checks, I find myself slightly troubled by the phrase “any additional information held by the Police that is considered relevant.” I do hope that that does not include hunches and at least has some basis in fact.

It also occurs to me that anything that applies to taxi drivers should also apply to driving instructors. The one mention I will probably ever get in the House of Commons came in 2009 as MPs debated Willie Rennie’s Bill (later passed) which provided for driving instructors to be suspended from their register if they were convicted of serious sexual assault. Willie thanked me and other members of his staff as having done “some of they initial spadework” in uncovering the loophole in the law. The reason this came about was because one of his constituents, Lesley Anne Steele, who bravely waived her right to anonymity to help make the case for the law to be changed. She had told us how she had been sexually assaulted by her driving instructor. After he had been convicted, she was horrified to see him out the next day teaching someone else to drive.

There is just as good reason to ensure that driving instructors are subjected to just as rigorous checks.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    Except that "referendum" is not a Latin 2nd Declension Neuter noun. It's a gerundive; as such it is used in English differently from Latin so should take an Eng...
  • PM
    @ PM, It can be either. I do remember from my schooldays that the plural in Latin involved replacing the 'um' of a neuter noun by an 'a'. I must have managed...
  • Alex Macfie
    It's "referendums"....
  • Alex Macfie
    Whether or not the comment about dead people was appropriate, it's dangerous to assume that high support for a position among youth, or a general trend of risin...
  • paul barker
    The problem with Referenda is that they are usually binary, giving Voters only two choices when there are actually multiple possibilities. Not only is that und...