Labour and Conservatives set to abandon green policies

Politics Home has an interesting survey of political opinion formers today. They were asked their views on how seriously Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats will take environmental policies in the future.

Andrew Rawnsley’s write-up says:

The PHI100 reckon that most of the politicians will follow the voters and downplay the environment.   Saving the planet will come second to saving their skins and seats.

‘The greed of the electorate and the fear of the parties will drive it off the agenda,’ one panellist remarks.

Another says: ‘Everybody will be running away from it, at least in terms of green taxes.’

Only a tiny proportion of the panel (two per cent) believe Labour will be the party most focussed on the environment at the next election. More of the panel, but still not that many (thirteen per cent) reckon that the Conservatives will be most driven by the green agenda.

The overwhelming view of the panel is that green issues will go back to being the passionate concern only of the Liberal Democrats among the main parties.  A big majority of the panel (seventy three per cent) say the Lib Dems will be the party most concerned with a green agenda at the next election. (Source: Politics Home)

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Martin Land 30th May '08 - 7:12pm

    The old maxim about recession ridding us of luxuries we can’t afford now seems to be, sadly, applied to the environment.

    We must stick to our guns.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • John Hann
    @Peter, "There is little difference ultimately". Although the cause is the same, there is one essential difference. Water companies with their jobs can't ...
  • Peter Wrigley
    I agree wholeheartedly with Edward Marsh's two final paragraphs: the problem is how to get there. @Jana: I wonder what evidence the Centre for Social Justice (...
  • Jana
    “ For an individual receiving benefits, the prospect of accepting a demanding job can be economically unattractive…” This is a key point. Last year the C...
  • Peter Hirst
    A codified constitution would have wording that would deal with this and other similar events. This is far preferable to allowing anything that the rules do not...
  • Peter Hirst
    The distinction between humanitarian and illegal migration is clear. For it to operate however there must be free, fair and easy mechanisms for those fleeing pe...