Layla Moran: Myanmar’s military must step back from the brink

Embed from Getty Images

Layla Moran, our spokesperson for Foreign Affairs, has spoken out against the coup unfolding in Myanmar:

Myanmar’s military must step back from the brink, end this coup and release all civilian leaders immediately.

The UK should step up and lead the world in shining a spotlight on the plight of democracy and human rights in Myanmar

Democracy and the rule of law need to be respected.

The Foreign Secretary should use this pivotal moment to urge the international community to secure democratic and human rights of all citizens in Myanmar.

Today’s developments are yet another disturbing chapter in Myanmar’s recent history of political unrest, which has already caused a refugee crisis forcing hundreds of thousands of Rohingya people to flee the country.

Their future now looks even more uncertain and perilous.

It is time for the UK to step up and lead the world in shining a spotlight on the plight of democracy and human rights in Myanmar, and seek peaceful resolution for all its people.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • John Marriott 2nd Feb '21 - 1:24pm

    Nobody could possibly disagree with what Ms Moran is saying. The problem is that the Generals are just not listening. Even when they returned to barracks a few years ago, they stayed in charge.

  • Resistance is beginning. Nobody wants to return to the harsh miliitary rule of the past in Burma

  • David Evans 2nd Feb '21 - 6:34pm

    “The Biden administration has formally determined that the military takeover in Myanmar constitutes a coup d’état, a designation that requires the US to cut its foreign assistance to the country.”

    Why don’t we do that?

  • Charles Smith 2nd Feb '21 - 8:50pm

    Hundreds of members of Myanmar’s Parliament remained confined inside their government housing in the country’s capital on Tuesday, a day after the military staged a coup and detained senior politicians including Nobel laureate and de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

    Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) party, meanwhile, released a statement calling for the military to honour the results of last November’s election and release of all of those detained.

  • As long as China supports Burma [ do not use the name Myanmar because the people were not asked] they will put two fingers up to us. I also expect India to help Burma because both nations are anti-Rhohinga.

  • Joseph Bourke 3rd Feb '21 - 1:25am

    The alleged genocide that is underway among the Uighur people in Xinjiang is reminiscent of what has been happening in Tibet and Southern Monglia for decades. The jailing of Nalvany in Russia on the pretext of a parole violation looks like a throwback to the Soviet days of secret police repression.
    With this military coup in Myanmar seemingly bringing a halt to the nascent democratic advances in that country, there is not a great deal of good news out there as 2021 gets underway.

  • We have to express shock and horror at what the generals have done, in order to uphold values we and many other countries hold dear. The downside is that in doing that we are advertising our impotence, because there is little we can do to actually force the leaders of the coup change their minds.
    Military intervention is unthinkable, and as has been shown many times over recent decades, trade sanctions hurt the people, not the rulers. The people of Iraq, Iran and Syria have been punished for having rulers we don’t like and they didn’t choose, causing needless suffering and death. In those cases we also gave the dictators a welcome excuse to blame western governments for everything going wrong under their regimes.
    In the case of Russia we have another option – targeting assets owned by the rulers and located in our country, but if you own a few £ billion of stolen property, losing it might seem a shame, but it won’t make people like Putin throw in the towel. In most cases, those who overthrow democracy have too much to lose to peacefully hand back power. So even if we had similar leverage over the Myanmar generals it would be useless. Encouraging and aiding opposition from within sounds good in principle, but that didn’t turn out well in Iraq and Syria. We need to come up with a new way to deal with these events, because we don’t have one right now. I hope I’m proved wrong.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    I hear what Charlie and others say about the tedium and pain of having to rehearse the same arguments about trans rights over and over again. I feel the same w...
  • Michael BG
    Michael Kilpatrick, As clause 4.5 allows more than one ballot on emergency motions I thought more than one ballot should be allowable on the normal motions. ...
  • William
    Thanks Richard for your sensible and reasonable contribution. Of course we use self-ID for gender and other characteristics (eg race); to use anything else woul...
  • Tristan Ward
    People may wish to consider this article about the Labour party, but it is equally applicable to the Liberal Democrats - arguably more so in my opinion: http...
  • Mel Borthwaite
    My observation is that - as this article illustrates - sex and gender are often conflated when, under the 2010 Equality Act, ‘sex’ and ‘gender reassignmen...