LDV Members’ Survey – MPs’ expenses (3): the political impact

On Tuesday evening, LDV emailed those Lib Dem party members signed-up to our private discussion forum inviting them to take part in a survey focusing on MPs’ expenses. Many thanks to the 240+ of you who have so far completed it; we’ll be publishing the results on LDV over the next few days. You can catch up on the results of all our past exclusive LDV members’ surveys by clicking here.

1.

LDV asked: On the basis of all that you have read, seen or heard – and trying to put party loyalties to one side – which political party do you think has come out worst of the MPs’ expenses row?

Here’s what you told us:

>> 48% – Labour Party
>> 6% – Conservative Party
>> 30% – Labour party and Conservative party equally
>> 0.5% – Liberal Democrats
>> 14% – All parties equally
>> 0.5% – None of them

I’d be interested to hear from LDV readers who are out on the doorsteps canvassing for the 4th June elections whether those responses mirror what you’re hearing from the voters.

2.

LDV then asked about the allegations against Lib Dem MPs: Which of these statements comes closest to your view:

Here’s what you said:

>> 42% – “The allegations against Lib Dem MPs are – relatively speaking – small beer. It is unfair on our MPs that they have been lumped-in with other, more serious, accusations.”

>> 54% – “The allegations against Lib Dem MPs may be smaller in size, but they are just as serious because the Lib Dems need to be, and be seen to be, different and better. Our MPs have let us down.”

>> 5% – Don’t know / Other

An interesting split, here, with a very significant minority of you taking a – generally – lenient view of those Lib Dem MPs’ expenses indiscretions which have so far been reported; but the majority of you stating quite simply that those Lib Dem MPs ‘named and shamed’ have let down the party.

(As promised yesterday, when I get chance the comments submitted by those who completed the survey will be posted in LDV’s private members-only discussion forum).

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 22nd May '09 - 8:28pm

    The second question was poorly expressed here, which is reflected by the fairly split vote. The two options are not mutually exclusive, and I would expect most respondents to think they are both true to some extent. Our MPs *have* let us down, and they *have* been treated unfairly in lumping their fairly minor infractions together with the gratuitous abuses of some of the others. Should have been two questions.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Iain Donaldson
    Thanks Mim, That's fair as a description of the counting process, but I think it's worth separating the voter experience from the administrator experience. ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Kira, I don't think many, if anyone, are seriously suggesting that we should all be exactly equal regardless of the effort we might put in. The question...
  • Iain Donaldson
    I think the main point of disagreement concerns the relationship between fiscal autonomy and monetary sovereignty. It is certainly true that only a currency ...
  • Iain Donaldson
    I think there is actually significant common ground between the comments by both Petyer and Kira, and the original article. The article does not argue that c...
  • theakes
    As someone who is paying for a grand-child at a private school and a Liberal left of centre person since 1961 I really think Tom needs to relax. The school has...