LDV Members’ Survey – MPs’ expenses (3): the political impact

On Tuesday evening, LDV emailed those Lib Dem party members signed-up to our private discussion forum inviting them to take part in a survey focusing on MPs’ expenses. Many thanks to the 240+ of you who have so far completed it; we’ll be publishing the results on LDV over the next few days. You can catch up on the results of all our past exclusive LDV members’ surveys by clicking here.

1.

LDV asked: On the basis of all that you have read, seen or heard – and trying to put party loyalties to one side – which political party do you think has come out worst of the MPs’ expenses row?

Here’s what you told us:

>> 48% – Labour Party
>> 6% – Conservative Party
>> 30% – Labour party and Conservative party equally
>> 0.5% – Liberal Democrats
>> 14% – All parties equally
>> 0.5% – None of them

I’d be interested to hear from LDV readers who are out on the doorsteps canvassing for the 4th June elections whether those responses mirror what you’re hearing from the voters.

2.

LDV then asked about the allegations against Lib Dem MPs: Which of these statements comes closest to your view:

Here’s what you said:

>> 42% – “The allegations against Lib Dem MPs are – relatively speaking – small beer. It is unfair on our MPs that they have been lumped-in with other, more serious, accusations.”

>> 54% – “The allegations against Lib Dem MPs may be smaller in size, but they are just as serious because the Lib Dems need to be, and be seen to be, different and better. Our MPs have let us down.”

>> 5% – Don’t know / Other

An interesting split, here, with a very significant minority of you taking a – generally – lenient view of those Lib Dem MPs’ expenses indiscretions which have so far been reported; but the majority of you stating quite simply that those Lib Dem MPs ‘named and shamed’ have let down the party.

(As promised yesterday, when I get chance the comments submitted by those who completed the survey will be posted in LDV’s private members-only discussion forum).

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 22nd May '09 - 8:28pm

    The second question was poorly expressed here, which is reflected by the fairly split vote. The two options are not mutually exclusive, and I would expect most respondents to think they are both true to some extent. Our MPs *have* let us down, and they *have* been treated unfairly in lumping their fairly minor infractions together with the gratuitous abuses of some of the others. Should have been two questions.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Kira Collins
    @David Raw “ And how, Kira, would you define “the basics of life” My grandfather used to tell me that when he attended school, he used to go in bare f...
  • Tom Reeve
    I read Mike’s email with interest. It started well before sliding into more of the same. Strong analysis on the campaign model, and the point that demogra...
  • Tom Reeve
    You can talk about Gini coefficients and wealth and income per decile until you’re blue in the face. The core issue exercising most voters is fairness and pow...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Iain, There is common ground on the federal question insofar as we agree that it could work. A federal system works well in Australia. The Aus...
  • David Wright
    Conviction of lying under election law can be more consequential, though prison was not involved: "Convicted Reform politician no longer councillor" https://w...