LDV readers say: pay MPs more!

A month ago, Lib Dem Voice set up a new poll for readers asking the simple question, MPs are currently paid £65k per annum. Do you think they should be paid more than this, the same, or less in the future?

Here’s what you told us:

44% (234 votes) – More than £65k
35% (187) – The same as now
21% (115) – Less than £65k
Total Votes: 536. Poll ran 24 Aug – 13 Sept 2009.

A plurality of LDV readers – who, of course, may or may not be representative of Lib Dem voters – believe our MPs to be under-paid, with just over one-third of you reckoning their current rate of pay is about right. Just one-fifth of you think members of Parliament should take a pay-cut.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Voice polls.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Duffield 26th Sep '09 - 10:17am

    “LDV readers say: pay MPs more!”

    No – 56% of LDV readers say pay MPs the same or less.

    Why are you headlining the minority view?

  • Tom Papworth 27th Sep '09 - 12:28am

    Andrew,

    To be fair, 79% say pay MPs the same or more. The truth is that there is no majority view. OTOH, very nearly half support paying them more.

    I’m more interested in who these people are, however. As readers of LDV may contain within their number a disproportionate number of PPCs, I can’t help but wonder whether some among the 234 who would like MPs to be paid more might have a vested interest.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
  • Peter Martin
    @Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
  • Gordon Lishman
    When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...
  • David Murray
    Typo: I first joined the Liberal Party in November 1966, almost 60 years ago this year !...