LDV survey: What Lib Dem members think are the biggest dangers to the party in the next 12 months

Lib Dem Voice has polled our members-only forum to discover what Lib Dem members think of a variety of key issues, and what you make of the Lib Dems’ and Government’s performance to date. Almost 600 party members have responded, and we’re currently publishing the full results of our survey.

Today we’re looking at what the Voice’s sample of party members consider to be the biggest dangers to the Lib Dems in the 12 months to come. We asked:

Which, if any, of the following factors are in your view the biggest danger to the Lib Dems in the next year? (Please tick all that apply.)

Here’s what you told us:

  • 82% – Failure to communicate how Lib Dem policies are making a big enough difference in government.
  • 59% – A hostile media which offers only a steady drip-drip of negative stories.
  • 55% – General unpopularity caused by spending cuts and tax rises.
  • 50% – Right-wing Conservative policies seen to dominate the Coalition’s agenda.
  • 49% – If next May’s AV referendum were to be lost.
  • 41% – Slow economic growth or even a double-dip recession.
  • 38% – Splits in the Lib Dem parliamentary party.
  • 32% – Losses for the party in next May’s Scottish, Welsh and local elections.
  • 31% – Tory MPs and the right-wing media extracting harsher Coalition policies on immigration, prisons and Europe.
  • 30% – A new Labour leader who ‘love-bombs’ Liberal Democrat voters.
  • 6% – Other
  • 0% – None of these.
  • 0% – Don’t know / No opinion

The breakdown is interesting. The overwhelming danger facing the party, according to more than four-in-five Lib Dem members, is the potential failure to communicate to the public what the Lib Dem achievements are within the government. In a sense, it’s an encouraging finding in that at least it’s a danger within the party’s control, and about which it can do something. That is less true of the second biggest danger facing us: the relentless negativity of the tribal right-wing and left-wing news media.

The other two threats attracting more than 50% of the vote in our survey were, unsurprisingly, related to the economy. First, the very real potential for the Coalition’s cuts agenda to hurt voters. And, secondly, the danger that the Tories are seen to dominate the Government, for example that the cuts agenda appears to be used ideologocially to shrink the state even in those areas where the Lib Dems would want government to be pro-active.

Two suprises (at least to me) of members’ responses to this question: first, that fewer than half (only just, but still) Lib Dems think that losing the AV referendum is a serious threat to the party; and, secondly, how low-risk the election of Labour’s new leader is held to be, with less than one-third thinking he (whichever Miliband brother it will be) poses a threat to the party in the next year. It says a lot about how poorly Labour has played its hand in opposition to date that so few Lib Dems regard them as a threat: the real self-perceived threat, according to party members, comes from within.

Of those who ticked ‘Other’ here are some of the extra dangers envisaged by Lib Dem members in the months to come – they’re an interesting bunch:

  • Losing our nerve
  • Party leadership and LD cabinet mebers losing their nerve
  • the general inability of the party to capitalise on success
  • failure to see that in other European countries where coalition is the norm partners do not pretend that they agree with everything but recognise that policies and actions are part of the deal. They advocate their own views
  • Coalition policy on ‘free’ schools and GPs running the health service
  • we are without the proper mentality to enjoy actually ruling
  • Cynical disregard of voters’ idealism
  • The move to a “graduate” contribution, if such a move is a perpetual requirement to pay a greater proportion of income
  • A continuing inability to grasp the professional necessities of being in power.
  • loss of our electoral identity
  • academies and SATS
  • Increased inequality as a result of Coalition activities.
  • Paying too much attention to the Liberal Democrat Party
  • Loss of members and funding due to disillusion
  • Nick Clegg failing communicate the Party’s unhapiness at Conservative inspired policies, such as free school, reform of the NHS & aggressive deficit reduction.
  • Grassroot LibDem members on the left of the party losing their nerve in large numbers
  • Loss of LD independence/voters unable to tell the difference between the two parties.
  • Loss of separate identity for the party in the eyes of the public
  • You can access all the results of past Lib Dem Voice surveys of party members here.

    Read more by .
    This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
    Advert

    7 Comments

    • I don’t think Labour have played their hand poorly so much as had a really rotten hand to start with. I guess when your party is leaderless and all your candidates for the job are all either total political lightweights, deeply personally weird, tainted by association with the previous government, or all three at the same time then it’s difficult to be much of a threat.

    • I am interested in the way these are expressed by Stephen or whoever has “written” the points. I would have thought rather than “losing nerve” (which sounds a very “leadership” way of putting it – and is applied to both ministers, and the “left” of the party, indicating to me this is from a right of centre perspective), the main issue is about what happens when / if the deficit reduction thing is shown to be the wrong way of going about the issue. So much has been written on this, and I think there is already a good case for saying it is the wrong approach. Unfortunately, this plays into the major fault line within the Lib Dems, ie economics.

      People may know that I have a strong belief that Lib Dems in London and the SE have a much more “economic liberal” (as it is euphemistically put) approach to economics than those in other parts of the country. I also believe that a disproportionate number of blog posters live in that area. So the question I would like to ask is “what proportion of those voting in the members’ survey live in those regions, compared with overall membership?”

      As someone who has tried but not yet been able to sign up to the Members’ Only section (because of Username issues), I feel somewhat powerless and a little aggrieved on this.

    • I also think Stephen is wrong to suggest that the overwhelming danger perceived by members “is within the party’s control”. There might be elements that are, but if we stray too far on to that agenda, Cameron etc will be down on us like a ton of bricks, so I think this is a way of saying we have gone too far from our core values in the coalition agreement.

    • We mustn’t be complacent about the Labour leader. Once elected he will have a head start on either Cameron or Nick or even Blair.

      Internal elections by necessity gravitate to the centre of the party, a newly elected leader of the opposition will be more of a threat to us by challenging us on the middle ground.

    • paul barker 1st Sep '10 - 11:05am

      I would like to raise another potential danger/opportunity, that Labour will be hit by bankruptcy/splits. That will strike a lot of you as fantasy but Labour do have debts of £20Million & they are riddles with divisions.
      If you accept the possibility, you may not see any threat – surely this is a lifetime of Xmas all at once ? The point is that we would have to move from 3rd Party to 1st or 2nd in a couple of years or see The Tories ruling alone & with massive majorities.

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert

    Recent Comments

    • Tim Rogers
      Jenny Barnes. Trouble is millions of people understand simple answers and vote for it....
    • Mick Taylor
      Mark Frankel is always 110% on the side of Netanyahu and the Israeli state, but his comments are not wholly wrong. I do feel angry that far too many people try ...
    • Steve Trevethan
      Might it be appropriate to promote whole nation-beneficial policies and their marketing, rather than concentrate on attacking other parties? Might it help to...
    • Ricky Treadwell
      Votes for all other parties will be up for grabs, we have to win anti-status quo voters from reform for example. To do this as can't just fire shots at unpop...
    • Christopher Haigh
      Coincidentally Tim Iredale on Politics North lad t Sunday devoted the whole programme to the way surviving coalfield communities of the South Yorkshire have bee...