Why commission a report if you’re determined to ignore its conclusions?

Last August, the then Labour government commissioned a KPMG report into the future of NHS Direct (along with some other related NHS services). The report has been submitted to the current government, though not published.

So if Labour MPs and members were saying how the government must publish the KPMG report right away to see if it justifies the plans to migrate NHS Direct over to the planned 111 service, fair enough.

But for many in Labour to be demanding that the NHS Direct plans be abandoned without knowing the outcome of the KPMG report is tantamount to saying, “Who cares what that report the Labour government commissioned says? I’ve got my entrenched view and there’s no point looking at any evidence because my mind is firmly made up.” In which case, why bother with commissioning that KPMG report in the first place?

Bit of a waste of money really if you’ve decided you don’t care what it says. And the government could do itself some favours by publishing the report for us all to see.

(By an odd coincidence, by the way, being called “Tom” seems to be the main criteria for saner views on this issue from Labour as it’s Tom Harris MP who blogged this thoughtful piece and Tom Watson MP who has been digging trying to get to see the KPMG report.)

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

14 Comments

  • Forlornehope 1st Sep '10 - 9:36am

    Labour is learning the lesson from the US Republican party. Don’t worry about logic, consistency, honesty or anything else. Just oppose, criticise, condemn. At the moment the Republicans look set to take the House and possibly the Senate. This is an effective approach and might just see a Labour PM back in number 10 within five years.

  • Gregor Murray 1st Sep '10 - 10:23am

    I could ask the same of the Liberal Democrats and their Steele Commission, which they seem to ignore alongwith the Calman Commission, and then of course, there was the Gould Commission that the LDs are also trying to ignore by having the AV referendum in May….

  • Foregone Conclusion 1st Sep '10 - 10:28am

    Whereas aborting a pilot into an alternative halfway through is practical commonsense, and not the same at all.

  • Why did the Dep of Health refuse to release the report under the FOI Act?

  • A Voice from Lothian 1st Sep '10 - 10:35am

    Gregor – the Steel Commission was not ignored. It was published and then was the Liberal Democrat submission to the Calman Commission which was then accepted as a compromise between Labour, Lib Dem and Tory parties in Scotland. The SNP of course refused to take part in the Calman Commission.

  • Mike(the Labour one) 1st Sep '10 - 12:28pm

    How about the contributors to this site, just once, find out Labour’s objections to issues before making posts about them? Wouldn’t that be novel?

  • Gregor Murray 1st Sep '10 - 2:40pm

    Of course the SNP refused to take part in Calman; a Government consultation that looked at ALL options was already underway, taking part in a restricted consultation on top of that is duplication.

    So is the LD position Steele or Calman? It can’t be both.

    Also, Gould?

  • > Paul: the reasons for refusing the FoI request are in the link from the post – basically because it’s about policy formulation.

    And is this a good reason at all? To quote a character from Star Trek TNG, “scrutiny does not frighten us”.

    If people cannot discuss policy because they are so afraid of being damaged by their own words, then perhaps such people should be removed from the process.

    Should not the new politics include that kind of transparency?

  • Certainly no staff at NHS Direct oppose the development off 111, it the need for NHS Direct to be the core of the new number, ensuring patients get a good service and we dont end up with 1,000 nurses on the Dole

    its outrageous that Ministers and Departnement of Health has not said anything to staff

    all they know todate is what is in newspapers

    its not acceptable

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 7th Jun - 5:12am
    How much were the masks if I may ask?
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 7th Jun - 12:51am
    Martin, I think you are right that it will be difficult for whoever is elected. If we look at what to expect, Japan's experience over...
  • User AvatarMartin 6th Jun - 10:54pm
    Jo Bourke: It looks unlikely that these problems will be anywhere near resolved in 2024, not only quite likely worse than in 2010, but falling...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 6th Jun - 9:37pm
    Talking about Covid, I hope that Jamie,and maybe Roger, feel they can persuade their colleagues at Westminster to protest about another matter that has appeared...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 6th Jun - 8:23pm
    @ Peter Martin Brexit did happen, but not until after another general election, and it was stated strongly in that general election that Brexit had...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 6th Jun - 7:34pm
    @ Matthew, "The real reason Brexit did not happen was that Brexiteers refused to compromise." Just on a point of information: Brexit did happen. Naturally...