Voice co-editor Mark Pack made his debut on Newsnight’s political panel last night, discussing the politics of the autumn statement. You can watch his thoughts below, or on YouTube here.
* Nick Thornsby is a day editor at Lib Dem Voice.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Why Britain should be wary of Andy Burnham’s Devolution Revolution (Iain Donaldson)
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Gaza (Tom Arms)
-
A shocking abuse of the legal system where the rich try to bully the weak and poor into submission
-
The Joy of Six 1540
-
Are we doing enough to insure against climate change?
-
Don't mention the Isle of Wight Separatists' 1950s terror campaign
-
Fergus McClelland was the last illegal major British child actor
-
Labour and the Liberals in 1924 and today
-
Family: Scene Through the Eye of a Lens
-
Brexit: The Uncivil War - the TV drama with Benedict Cumberbatch
-
A power vacuum?
Recent Comments
William Wallace
I think I became a Liberal from listening to sermons of the social gospel when I was a choirboy. But the social gospel of the New Testament is a very long way ...
Nick Baird
I would add to David Evans' valid concerns above. We are facing reverse-devolution via the abolition of our local (firmly Lib Dem controlled) Borough Council. W...
Mick Taylor
@Jana. I am a lifelong Liberal Democrat and a Quaker. I am a believer in the Quaker Peace testimony and this means that I differ from the party on ways to achie...
Tom Bailey
So we have a contrived speech of “motherhood and apple pie” with zero detail, and financial accounting, given to his *lovey-lanyard* wearing “disciples�...
Jana
“ What our party does sometimes understandably struggle with is not Christianity itself, but with the social conservatism that some Christians in our party se...
7 Comments
Did Mark Pack really think the Lords were going to vote on the Autumn Statement?
Chris: No, I was referring to one of the pieces of legislation announced in it.
But surely the Lords won’t vote on it, as it’s a money bill?
I think Mark definitely passed the Paxo test. Survived with dignity, and got some good points across. Well done!
I don’t think welfare bills are classed as “money bills” — I think that just refers to measures for raising money rather than spending it.
In fact, having posted that, I thought “Don’t be so lazy” and went and looked it up:
“A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans and their management. It is only considered to be a Money Bill if the Speaker of the House of Commons agrees that it is. The Speaker signs a certificate to indicate this. The most important Money Bills are those that deal with taxation bills or the Consolidated Fund Bills that formally vote money to the government.”
So, yes I think the Lords will get a vote (especially as it’s up to Speaker Berkow to decide whether to give it a free ride!).
“A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans …”
It would deal with “public money”, wouldn’t it? More specifically “the appropriation, receipt, custody, issue or audit of accounts of public money” (my emphasis):
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p05.pdf
We’ll see, but I wonder if Osborne is really so wise to emphasise the fact that the measures in this statement primarily penalise those on the lowest incomes. It’s certainly not much help to the Lib Dem narrative about the raising of the tax threshold.