William Powell AM writes… Why we must protect rural banking

Almost every week brings news of the closure of bank branches in rural areas. As an Assembly Member in Wales representing a large rural region, I know at first hand the real effects of bank closures on local communities and businesses. Latest figures from the Campaign for Community Banking Services, published in September, show that in the last ten years just under 2,000 bank branches have closed. There are now 900 communities that have only one bank branch and 1,200 communities with no bank branch at all. The traditional ‘Big 4’ banks closed 178 branches in 2011. Estimates suggest a similar rate of closures for 2012.

So, why does it matter? Surely these days everyone is using internet banking which is open 24/7 and is much more convenient? Well, it matters for a number of good reasons:

• Successful and sustainable economic growth in rural areas requires a local banking system;
• Closure of bank branches can significantly reduce footfall in high streets, leading to reduced retail turnover which then has an impact on the sustainability of rural small towns;
• Some rural areas simply cannot get access to high speed broadband – this means some people can no longer access banking services except by telephone;
• Older people sometimes cannot or do not want to use internet banking;
• Rural businesses still need access to bank counter services – otherwise they have to travel large distances to deposit cash etc.

A banking service should provide not only counter services but also access to credit based on local lending decisions and to locally-based banking advice. The ‘Big 4’ are voting with their feet, driven by pressures on profitability, increased capital requirements and the necessary split of retail from investment banking.

But we cannot and must not allow this to happen. We need to think through how the local Post Office network can be used more effectively to provide these services, whether branch networks can be shared, and how both consumer and business credit unions can be developed in rural areas. We also need to look to alternative models elsewhere in Europe and in the United States.

The truth is that UK banking has been driven by profit motives to provide large loans to financial institutions for quick returns, rather than putting the same money into smaller firms, which would create more sustainable economic growth. In contrast, both Germany and the US have strong locally-based banking systems, which are more likely to lend to smaller businesses. Germany has a network of 1,700 Volksbanken, small co-operative banks which operate locally. Likewise, in the USA an example is the Bank of North Dakota, a public development bank that was originally founded by farmers concerned at their difficulty in obtaining loans at affordable rates.

We need to change the banking system to ensure that we have many small, thriving local banks and banks that think locally. We need to provide the right incentives to the banking system, whether through legislation, reform of the banking sector, credit guidance or laws about data disclosure. We also need to give an incentive to think locally.

We have the powers because, as taxpayers, we own some of the big banks and we should be able to shape how they operate. There should also be support for existing smaller banks, for the creation of new community and regional banks and for credit unions. Banking reform is an urgent priority for all of us, but especially for rural communities.

* Cllr William Powell is President of the Welsh Liberal Democrats

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Good article – very important issue.

  • David Pollard 6th Dec '12 - 7:39pm

    The emphasis should be on the Post Office which should be encourage to provide banking services, especially to accept cash and check in payments. That is what the Giro Bank should have evolved into, rather than being sold off to the Alliance and Leicester Building Society.

  • Richard Dean 7th Dec '12 - 12:32am

    Even country folk like to travel to towns somnetimes, often at least once a week, maybe Saturday, so one solution could be to provide Saturday morning banking in country towns. Another idea miight be a mobile bank, a caravan that would visit different villages on different days of the week.

    Banks really are businesses and it doesn’t seem appropriate to ask a business to provide a service at a loss. Do the ordinary people who actually live in the affected communities complain, or is the complaining being done without their input?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Unfortunately he lives in Uffculme which is going to be split from the main part of the constituency at the next election, do we know if he's ok with moving to ...
  • Peter Martin
    "In 2016, Boris Johnson and Michael Gove claimed that Brexit would allow us to cut VAT on energy bills." I'm no supporter of either but this wasn't ...
  • Mick Scholes
    Just checked with Wikipedia, and Jo Grimond was a Major. I do believe the sound of gunfire is coming from Honiton & Tiverton, if anyone is in doubt about w...
  • John
    Compass: No matter which progressive party we align with, it’s our ability to find common ground that sets us apart from a politics of fear and division. T...
  • Brad Barrows
    @Chris Moore To be fair, I did say that “many Liberal Democrats are closer to the Conservatives than to the progressive alternatives” and then illustrated ...