LDV’s top 12 posts of 2017 – Number 9

We continue our meander through the top dozen LDV posts of the year with another trip back to January.

#9 This is how to respect the referendum result

In this post, Rob Parsons tackled the argument that those of us who wish to remain in the EU were disrespecting the referendum result and flouting the “will of the people.”

Generally speaking electoral votes stand, even if the majority is unsatisfactory. But that is premised on two conditions.  The first is that the voters get a chance regularly to change their minds. The second is that the voters were – at least relatively – well informed about the subject of their vote. All sides make their offers clear, and the media do a proper job of examining their claims.

Neither of these conditions applies to the referendum vote. There will not be a chance to change our minds about this one. Once we leave the EU, we will not be in a position to get back in for a considerable time. And if we do decide that rejoining might be nice, the conditions to rejoin will be the same as a new joiner, including having to join the Euro, which I do not see happening. So effectively, leaving the EU sets Britain’s course for at least a couple of generations. This vote is not sufficient basis for such a momentous and long term decision.

And the voters were seriously misinformed about what leaving meant. I blame both campaigns and the media for this. The Remain campaign was feeble, the most disorganised and ineffective campaign I have seen in British politics. Even Labour’s 1983 election campaign did not plumb the depths of this one. The Leave campaign was based on deliberate and sustained mendacity from start to finish.

 

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Peter Hirst 31st Dec '17 - 5:38pm

    I agree and would add the franchise was not complete. For it to have any relevance long-term, there should have been a threshold, say two thirds for the change. For a country that invented modern democracy, it was a very shabby process.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Simon McGrath
    Ironic that the first comment is anti semitic conspiracy theory. Alex missed out the part of the Balfour declaration "it being clearly understood that nothing...
  • David Raw
    I've often wondered what P.M. David Lloyd George's motives were, both personally as and politically, when he supported the Balfour Declaration. I do know he was...
  • Russell
    You do realise that eventually the triple lock will cost more than 100%of uk gdp...
  • William Wallace
    Andrew Neill thinks of peerages as 'honours' and think they should only go to 'entrepreneurs' (which he has never been...). But the Lords is nowadays a working...
  • Peter Chambers
    Good points about alleged copyright theft. Looking at the numbers for "trillion parameter models" it would seem that only pouring all the written material in th...