Lib Dem fiscal policy in a nutshell

Ahead of this evening’s debate between Alistair Darling, George Osborne and Vince Cable, you might find this little summary of the party’s fiscal policies helpful:

  • The party’s proposed tax cuts (such as raising the basic rate income tax threshold to £10,000) will be paid for by tax rises elsewhere in the system (such as ending the higher rate tax relief on pension contributions)
  • The party’s spending savings (such as scrapping ID cards) will be spent two-thirds on cutting the deficit and one-third on other policies (such as the pupil premium)

As to exactly how much savings will be identified, that in part awaits the manifesto. But the party has also made clear that the search for savings would continue beyond that – not unreasonable given that until you’re in charge and see the full details of the books, there is only so far you can go in identifying savings.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • I wonder whether the Tories in their quest for change will indicate that they’d change the rules so that the books were open for all parties to see?

  • I seem to recall that cutting the £97 Billion Trident project is also one of the savings identified

  • Malcolm Todd 29th Mar '10 - 10:00pm

    Don’t get too excited about that £97 billion – it’s over something like 30 years, so won’t make a huge difference to the deficit. (It won’t be nothing, mind – so long as the MoD doesn’t demand that the difference is all spend on ‘conventional’ defence; but it’s important to keep reminding ourselves of the difference between debt and deficit, and the corresponding difference between one-off and annual savings.)

  • Stephen Dedalus 29th Mar '10 - 10:45pm

    True, it is over 30 years but the cost of running and maintaing the system alone will be about £2.3 Billion a year which seems a huge waste. Then there’s the upfront payments such as £14bn on new Subs and £3bn on warheads. It all adds up and could be spent on something more useful.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Murray
    In the above, it should have said $100 billion EACH YEAR from 2009....
  • David Murray
    Something like International Development Bonds will be needed (with safeguards) to fill the vacuum left by cuts in foreign aid. Back in 2009, developed countrie...
  • tom arms
    Alan Jeffs, I don't have an exhaustive, but out of the following countries: Kenya, Zambia, South Africa, Mozambique, Nigeria, Ghana, Botswana, Senegal, Tanzania...
  • Simon R
    Interesting idea. It would though effectively amount to loans, which would therefore place developing countries even more in debt - and there are still ongoing...
  • Alan Jelfs
    The problem with your scheme is that the developing world has a nasty habit of not paying its debts....