The Voice

Lib Dem MP to put down motion against expenses cover-up

By | Sun 18th January 2009 - 1:32 pm

Yesterday David Heath said that both he and Nick Clegg opposed plans to exempt MPs from having to publish full details of their expenses. Now fellow Liberal Democrat MP Jo Swinson has said she will be putting down a Parliamentary motion supporting this opposition:

Jo Swinson, will on Monday table a parliamentary motion against the Government’s decision to exempt MPs from publishing full details of their expenses.

The motion criticises the “regressive effect” of the move on Parliamentary transparency.

Commenting, Jo Swinson said: “Ministers should not be cooking up plans to keep MPs’ expenses hidden from public view. With this new legislation in force, it will be one rule for MPs and another for everyone else.

This move just gives the impression that MPs have something to hide. Ministers must prevent it coming into force, to prevent further damage being done to the already tarnished image of Parliament as far as expenses are concerned.”

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    Thank you for an interesting and relevant artticle, not least the contemporary, relevance of the writings of Hannah Arendt. Might the profound need for pol...
  • Kira Collins
    @Henry My frustration with the election result is due to seeing us lose half our vote share while the Green Party can stand for the first time and immediately ...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Tristan Ward Let’s put some numbers on that. This study (from Denmark published in 2016*) put the number at 6.4 46 XY females per female 100,000 live birt...
  • Daniel Walker
    @David Raw "I didn’t say that, Daniel, though what I imply is that the party needs to prove to and make clear to the electorate the value and choices that ...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "England is too much larger than the other three for that to work in any satisfactory way, as I mentioned to Kira." I don't agree. If all matters other than th...