Stephen Tall

Lib Dems oppose ‘non-dom’ Ron Sandler as chairman of Lloyds

By | Tue 21st July 2009 - 2:30 pm

So the Telegraph reports:

Ron Sandler should not be eligible for the job of chairman of Lloyds Banking Group because he is non-domiciled for tax purposes, the Liberal Democrats have declared. …

“The chairman of a nationalised, or part-nationalised, bank should not be a non-dom,” Lord Oakeshott, Lib Dem Treasury spokesman said. “Ron Sandler should not become chairman of Lloyds.”

The Lib Dems opposed the appointment at Northern Rock of Mr Sandler, a former boss of the Lloyds of London insurance market. He was initially paid £90,000 a month as executive chairman but his salary fell to £350,000 after appointing a chief executive and moving to non-executive. At Lloyds he would expect to be paid about £600,000. …

UKFI, the body that manages the taxpayer’s stakes in the banks, is unlikely to object to Mr Sandler over his non-dom status. The Government appears to be unconcerned about non-doms despite attempting a tax clampdown on them two years ago. Northern Rock’s former finance director Ann Godbehere was also a non-dom.

Is Lord Oakeshott right to demand the next Lloyds chairman should be domiciled and paying tax within the UK? Or should the sole criterion be who is best for the job regardless of their tax status? Over to you…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Martin Land 21st Jul '09 - 3:13pm

    It’s symbolic of the moral bankruptcy of the Labour Party and the Labour Government that they can no longer see this issue clearly. Very sad.

  • simonsez 21st Jul '09 - 3:42pm

    If they could manage it I expect the whole cabinet and tory front bench would be non-doms.

  • Roger Shade 21st Jul '09 - 7:02pm

    Simonez is right but would it not be better if they Non-res as well.

  • tim leunig 21st Jul '09 - 11:24pm

    Surely this is a non-issue? Imagine we were going to pay £100k gross, with the govt getting c. £40k back in income tax. Then we discover he is non-dom’d, so we reduce the gross pay to £60k, effectively in lieu of the tax that he would have paid. Sorted. Next problem?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    @KeithCresswell. You could argue that NI is just income tax by another name, except that your NI contributions determine the level of pension you can get. If we...
  • Simon McGrath
    Congratulations on the great work in Watford. But this seems very confused : "The economic consequences of continuing our dependence on petrol and diesel are s...
  • Peter Martin
    The correct question to ask is "how are you going to find the resources?" which often isn't the same as "how are you going to pay for it?" If we want more so...
  • Keith Creswell
    A civilised society should try to improve the lot of its poorer pensioners so on balance I believe the triple lock should be kept. However, the reference to an...
  • David Allen
    Peter, The far right are just as strong in Germany, France, Italy etc as they are in the UK. It's not specifically the far right that the EU are worried abo...