Lib Dems publish gender pay gap – or lack of it

For International Women’s Day, the party has published the gender pay gap for its employees. And it’s good news.

Liberal Democrats fought hard in coalition for large companies to publish the discrepancy between what they pay men and women to help close the gap of gender inequality in the workplace.

As of March 8th 2016 the annual gender pay gap for staff employed by Liberal Democrat HQ was 0.4%, with women earning more than men on average.

Liberal Democrats are working hard to encourage a better gender balance within the party and a motion on Electing Diverse MPs will be voted upon in its upcoming Spring Conference.

If you were wondering how the gender pay gap is published, you basically work out the average pay for women and men in any given organisation and your gap is the difference between them. I’d definitely be interested in seeing what the other parties’ figures are.

What’s also good is that women make up the majority of the Directors at LDHQ.

The Scottish Party is an accredited Living Wage employer and Tim Farron has said that his proudest achievement is eliminating unpaid internships from Party HQ.

This is all good news. I do worry about how hard some of our staff work, though – especially when so many of them do so much for the party as volunteers too. Resolving that is our next challenge.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • the party has published the gender pay gap for its employees. Where? Can’t find any reference to it on http://www.libdems.org.uk/.

    If you were wondering how the gender pay gap is published, you basically work out the average pay for women and men in any given organisation and your gap is the difference between them.

    You could but then you wouldn’t satisfy the minimum reporting requirements nor the objectives that Jo Swimson was trying to achieve…

    I therefore conclude an opportunity to showcase a LibDem policy initative has been lost…

  • David Evershed 9th Mar '16 - 2:52pm

    The draft government regulations about the publication of gender pay include

    Employers will have to publish:
    The difference in mean pay during the pay period between male and female employees (regulation 4);
    The difference in median pay during the pay period between male and female employees (regulation 5);
    The difference in mean bonus payments between male and female employees (regulation 6)
    The proportion of male and female employees who received bonus pay during the period of twelve months preceding the relevant date(regulation 6), expressed as a percentage of the total number of all relevant male employees and female employees respectively;
    The numbers of male and female relevant employees according to quartile pay bands, A,B,C and D (regulation 7).

    Where are these details for the Lib Dem organisation?

    Note also:
    The definition of pay will be consistent with the definition of pay used by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) for the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE). Pay includes basic pay, paid leave, maternity pay, sick pay, area allowances, shift premium pay, bonus pay and other pay (including car allowances paid through the payroll, on call and standby allowances, clothing, first aider or fire warden allowances). It does not include overtime pay, expenses, the value of salary sacrifice schemes, benefits in kind, redundancy pay, arrears of pay and tax credits (regulation 2).
    The gross hourly rate of pay will be determined using the weekly pay divided by weekly basic paid hours for each employee.
    Also consistent with the ONS approach will be the week to be reported on; this will be the last week in April, which ONS has advised is the most typical week for earnings. For their first report, employers will be able to reach back into that week.

    Are the Lib Dem figurs consistent with these requirements?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve J Smith
    Even Save The Children are against this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S47oBPzphCw TechDirt did a very good piece on it too. There's no evidence that kids ar...
  • David Warren
    Great initiative. I have filled in the questionaire and would urge all other members to do so!...
  • John Barrett
    Until big tech companies are forced to remove dangerous content from their social media platforms children need to be protected, and one way to do that is to st...
  • Nonconformistradical
    " In fact, most rich people employed clever tax avoidance experts to create and find loopholes, and thereby dodge their tax bills." Isn't this justification ...
  • Chloe
    Mick; Debate and discussion lead to a majority of just 23. There's very strong opinions on either side. And parliamentarians should not be giving out emotive ex...