Lib Link: Shas Sheehan Government must defend DFID’s autonomy and expertise

Enshrining the 0.7% GDP for international aid provision in law was a brilliant Lib Dem achievement brought about by former Lib Dem Secretary of State Mike Moore.

Now it is coming under threat by Tories who have always opposed it. In an article for Politics Home, Lib Dem peer Shas Sheehan writes a blistering defence of it.

Enshrining in law the UK’s aid commitment was a hugely progressive step. But it has been haunted by years of attack from Conservative MPs such as former and current DFID Secretaries Priti Patel and Penny Mordaunt. The latest person to take aim at this life-saving budget is Boris Johnson.

Boris’ backing of the paper Global Britain: A Blueprint for the 21st Century is shameful. The paper calls for a severe, multi-billion-pound cut to UK’s Overseas Aid budget and closure of DFID. It shrugs off the fact that this budget has played a major role in the fight to eradicate poverty and promote sustainable development across the world. It dismisses the fact that it has helped to transform people’s lives and lift many out of inhumane conditions.

Far from positioning post-Brexit Britain as a global player regaining its place on the world stage, slashing the UK aid budget and threatening our place in the OECD’s forum of major international donors instead paints the UK as an inward-looking island no longer in step with the realities of the contemporary world. As Save the Children have said, the UK is an International Development superpower but these suggestions risk that. Brexit is already threatening our seat at the top table, we must not allow Conservative whims to threaten it further.

Just over a week ago, another prominent Brexiter Tory, the Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt suggested that the Government’s development spending should become more reliant on private sector investment and philanthropy. But the role of aid shouldn’t be to keep business happy or be about profit margins and returns. Aid is about unconditional assistance aimed at ending poverty and conflict, tackling climate change, and promoting human rights and sustainable development. Heaven forbid that we return to the bad old days when scandalous incidents such as the Pergau Dam arms deal for aid could happen.

However, using the expertise that DFID possesses to leverage in greater investment from the city and develop mechanisms to harness the goodwill that the British public shows to those less fortunate than us is a different matter, and will help us realise the trillions of dollars that will be needed to achieve the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

That is a different concept and one that I would support, and I might add, gives even more weight to the argument that protecting the DFID’s autonomy together with its commensurate expertise is paramount.

You can read her whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • British international aid should be administered with conditions attached. Such as improving the human rights of LGBT communities worldwide.
    If foreign governments are unwilling to comply then International aid can be withheld. There should be limits to the UK’s generosity.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Graem Peters
    “Will it call on the UK to join?” may be deemed less significant by Trump than it was for Bush. The latter sought UK backing with international cover in min...
  • Catherine Crosland
    Nick Baird, There are no easy answers, but surely it is better to focus on improving palliative care, and also research towards finding preventions and cures f...
  • Nick Baird
    @Catherine Crosland - surely another valid question is how many people should be forced to endure pain, suffering and distress for up to an additional 6 months ...
  • Catherine Crosland
    If any MPs are reading this, I would like to ask you this : Are you prepared to accept the fact that inevitably some vulnerable people will be coerced into endi...
  • Dominic
    @Mike Peters - I agree that we should indeed support the right of people of sound mind to end their lives whether or not they suffer from a terminal illness. ...